From: "Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
To: "yang_y_yi@163.com" <yang_y_yi@163.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: "Hu, Jiayu" <jiayu.hu@intel.com>,
"techboard@dpdk.org" <techboard@dpdk.org>,
"thomas@monjalon.net" <thomas@monjalon.net>,
"yangyi01@inspur.com" <yangyi01@inspur.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] gso: fix free issue of mbuf gso segments attach to
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 13:16:43 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BYAPR11MB33014AA4E71F57406C4DD5299A1D0@BYAPR11MB3301.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201022065151.10108-1-yang_y_yi@163.com>
>
> rte_gso_segment decreased refcnt of pkt by one, but
> it is wrong if pkt is external mbuf, pkt won't be
> freed because of incorrect refcnt, the result is
> application can't allocate mbuf from mempool because
> mbufs in mempool are run out of.
>
> One correct way is application should call
> rte_pktmbuf_free after calling rte_gso_segment to free
> pkt explicitly. rte_gso_segment mustn't handle it, this
> should be responsibility of application.
Probably needs to be stated clearly:
It is a change in functional behaviour.
Without deprecation note in advance.
TB members: please provide your opinion on that patch.
>
> Fixes: 119583797b6a ("gso: support TCP/IPv4 GSO")
> Signed-off-by: Yi Yang <yangyi01@inspur.com>
> ---
> Changelog:
>
> v1->v2:
> - update description of rte_gso_segment().
> - change code which calls rte_gso_segment() to
> fix free issue.
>
> ---
> app/test-pmd/csumonly.c | 3 ++-
> doc/guides/prog_guide/generic_segmentation_offload_lib.rst | 7 +++++--
I think release notes also have to be updated.
> lib/librte_gso/rte_gso.c | 9 +--------
> lib/librte_gso/rte_gso.h | 7 +++++--
> 4 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/app/test-pmd/csumonly.c b/app/test-pmd/csumonly.c
> index 3d7d244..829e07f 100644
> --- a/app/test-pmd/csumonly.c
> +++ b/app/test-pmd/csumonly.c
> @@ -1080,11 +1080,12 @@ struct simple_gre_hdr {
> ret = rte_gso_segment(pkts_burst[i], gso_ctx,
> &gso_segments[nb_segments],
> GSO_MAX_PKT_BURST - nb_segments);
> + /* pkts_burst[i] can be freed safely here. */
> + rte_pktmbuf_free(pkts_burst[i]);
It doesn't look correct to me.
I think it should be:
If (ret > 1) rte_pktmbuf_free(pkts_burst[i]);
> if (ret >= 0)
> nb_segments += ret;
> else {
> TESTPMD_LOG(DEBUG, "Unable to segment packet");
> - rte_pktmbuf_free(pkts_burst[i]);
> }
> }
About drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c:
I think it has to be modified too, as here:
/* free original mbuf */
rte_pktmbuf_free(mbuf_in);
/* free tso mbufs */
if (num_tso_mbufs > 0)
rte_pktmbuf_free_bulk(mbuf, num_tso_mbufs);
if mbuf[0] == mbuf_in
Will have a double free() for the same mbuf.
>
> diff --git a/doc/guides/prog_guide/generic_segmentation_offload_lib.rst b/doc/guides/prog_guide/generic_segmentation_offload_lib.rst
> index 205cb8a..8577572 100644
> --- a/doc/guides/prog_guide/generic_segmentation_offload_lib.rst
> +++ b/doc/guides/prog_guide/generic_segmentation_offload_lib.rst
> @@ -25,8 +25,9 @@ Bearing that in mind, the GSO library enables DPDK applications to segment
> packets in software. Note however, that GSO is implemented as a standalone
> library, and not via a 'fallback' mechanism (i.e. for when TSO is unsupported
> in the underlying hardware); that is, applications must explicitly invoke the
> -GSO library to segment packets. The size of GSO segments ``(segsz)`` is
> -configurable by the application.
> +GSO library to segment packets, they also must call ``rte_pktmbuf_free()`` to
> +free mbuf GSO segments attach to after calling ``rte_gso_segment()``.
Probably worth to mention that if return code == 1, then
output mbuf will point to input mbuf and extra care with free() is required.
> The size
> +of GSO segments ``(segsz)`` is configurable by the application.
>
> Limitations
> -----------
> @@ -233,6 +234,8 @@ To segment an outgoing packet, an application must:
>
> #. Invoke the GSO segmentation API, ``rte_gso_segment()``.
>
> +#. Call ``rte_pktmbuf_free()`` to free mbuf ``rte_gso_segment()`` segments.
> +
> #. If required, update the L3 and L4 checksums of the newly-created segments.
> For tunneled packets, the outer IPv4 headers' checksums should also be
> updated. Alternatively, the application may offload checksum calculation
> diff --git a/lib/librte_gso/rte_gso.c b/lib/librte_gso/rte_gso.c
> index 751b5b6..0d6cae5 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_gso/rte_gso.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_gso/rte_gso.c
> @@ -30,7 +30,6 @@
> uint16_t nb_pkts_out)
> {
> struct rte_mempool *direct_pool, *indirect_pool;
> - struct rte_mbuf *pkt_seg;
> uint64_t ol_flags;
> uint16_t gso_size;
> uint8_t ipid_delta;
> @@ -80,13 +79,7 @@
> return 1;
> }
>
> - if (ret > 1) {
> - pkt_seg = pkt;
> - while (pkt_seg) {
> - rte_mbuf_refcnt_update(pkt_seg, -1);
> - pkt_seg = pkt_seg->next;
> - }
> - } else if (ret < 0) {
> + if (ret < 0) {
> /* Revert the ol_flags in the event of failure. */
> pkt->ol_flags = ol_flags;
> }
> diff --git a/lib/librte_gso/rte_gso.h b/lib/librte_gso/rte_gso.h
> index 3aab297..f6694f9 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_gso/rte_gso.h
> +++ b/lib/librte_gso/rte_gso.h
> @@ -89,8 +89,11 @@ struct rte_gso_ctx {
> * the GSO segments are sent to should support transmission of multi-segment
> * packets.
> *
> - * If the input packet is GSO'd, its mbuf refcnt reduces by 1. Therefore,
> - * when all GSO segments are freed, the input packet is freed automatically.
> + * If the input packet is GSO'd, all the indirect segments are attached to the
> + * input packet.
> + *
> + * rte_gso_segment() will not free the input packet no matter whether it is
> + * GSO'd or not, the application should free it after call rte_gso_segment().
> *
> * If the memory space in pkts_out or MBUF pools is insufficient, this
> * function fails, and it returns (-1) * errno. Otherwise, GSO succeeds,
> --
> 1.8.3.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-22 13:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-22 6:51 yang_y_yi
2020-10-22 13:16 ` Ananyev, Konstantin [this message]
2020-10-22 15:33 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-10-23 0:57 ` Hu, Jiayu
2020-10-23 13:23 ` yang_y_yi
2020-10-23 13:21 ` yang_y_yi
2020-10-23 13:18 ` yang_y_yi
2020-10-23 14:46 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-10-26 0:57 ` yang_y_yi
2020-10-26 2:06 ` Jiayu Hu
2020-10-26 2:12 ` yang_y_yi
2020-10-26 6:16 ` Jiayu Hu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=BYAPR11MB33014AA4E71F57406C4DD5299A1D0@BYAPR11MB3301.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
--to=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=jiayu.hu@intel.com \
--cc=techboard@dpdk.org \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=yang_y_yi@163.com \
--cc=yangyi01@inspur.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).