* [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] app/testpmd: fix tunnel offload validation
@ 2021-11-02 12:24 Gregory Etelson
2021-11-17 8:57 ` Gregory Etelson
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Gregory Etelson @ 2021-11-02 12:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev, getelson; +Cc: matan, rasland, stable, Xiaoyun Li
Tunnel offload API allows application to restore packet to
its original form if chain of flows missed after DECAP action.
The main idea of the tunnel offload API was to query port PMD
to provide flow elements - actions or items.
Flow elements supplied by PMD are merged with original flow rule
elements provided by testpmd operator to create a new flow rule,
optimal for PMD, to implement the tunnel offload API.
That flow rule transformation is hidden form testpmd operator and uses
internal testpmd resources.
Current testpmd did not release tunnel offload resources if flow rule
validation failed.
The patch always releases tunnel offload resources after flow rule
validation returns.
Cc: stable@dpdk.org
Fixes: 1b9f274623b8 ("app/testpmd: add commands for tunnel offload")
Signed-off-by: Gregory Etelson <getelson@nvidia.com>
---
app/test-pmd/config.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/app/test-pmd/config.c b/app/test-pmd/config.c
index a18871d461..4870aaeba6 100644
--- a/app/test-pmd/config.c
+++ b/app/test-pmd/config.c
@@ -2011,6 +2011,7 @@ port_flow_validate(portid_t port_id,
struct rte_flow_error error;
struct port_flow_tunnel *pft = NULL;
struct rte_port *port;
+ int ret;
if (port_id_is_invalid(port_id, ENABLED_WARN) ||
port_id == (portid_t)RTE_PORT_ALL)
@@ -2037,10 +2038,11 @@ port_flow_validate(portid_t port_id,
if (pft->actions)
actions = pft->actions;
}
- if (rte_flow_validate(port_id, attr, pattern, actions, &error))
- return port_flow_complain(&error);
+ ret = rte_flow_validate(port_id, attr, pattern, actions, &error);
if (tunnel_ops->enabled)
port_flow_tunnel_offload_cmd_release(port_id, tunnel_ops, pft);
+ if (ret)
+ return port_flow_complain(&error);
printf("Flow rule validated\n");
return 0;
}
--
2.33.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* RE: [PATCH] app/testpmd: fix tunnel offload validation
2021-11-02 12:24 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] app/testpmd: fix tunnel offload validation Gregory Etelson
@ 2021-11-17 8:57 ` Gregory Etelson
2021-11-17 10:09 ` Ferruh Yigit
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Gregory Etelson @ 2021-11-17 8:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev, ferruh.yigit
Cc: Matan Azrad, Raslan Darawsheh, NBU-Contact-Thomas Monjalon
Hello Ferruh,
Can you estimate when this patch will be merged into 21.11 ?
Thank you.
Regards,
Gregory
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gregory Etelson <getelson@nvidia.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 2, 2021 14:24
> To: dev@dpdk.org; Gregory Etelson
> <getelson@nvidia.com>
> Cc: Matan Azrad <matan@nvidia.com>; Raslan
> Darawsheh <rasland@nvidia.com>;
> stable@dpdk.org; Xiaoyun Li
> <xiaoyun.li@intel.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] app/testpmd: fix tunnel offload
> validation
>
> Tunnel offload API allows application to restore
> packet to
> its original form if chain of flows missed after
> DECAP action.
> The main idea of the tunnel offload API was to
> query port PMD
> to provide flow elements - actions or items.
> Flow elements supplied by PMD are merged with
> original flow rule
> elements provided by testpmd operator to
> create a new flow rule,
> optimal for PMD, to implement the tunnel
> offload API.
> That flow rule transformation is hidden form
> testpmd operator and uses
> internal testpmd resources.
>
> Current testpmd did not release tunnel offload
> resources if flow rule
> validation failed.
>
> The patch always releases tunnel offload
> resources after flow rule
> validation returns.
>
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>
> Fixes: 1b9f274623b8 ("app/testpmd: add
> commands for tunnel offload")
>
> Signed-off-by: Gregory Etelson
> <getelson@nvidia.com>
> ---
> app/test-pmd/config.c | 6 ++++--
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/app/test-pmd/config.c b/app/test-
> pmd/config.c
> index a18871d461..4870aaeba6 100644
> --- a/app/test-pmd/config.c
> +++ b/app/test-pmd/config.c
> @@ -2011,6 +2011,7 @@
> port_flow_validate(portid_t port_id,
> struct rte_flow_error error;
> struct port_flow_tunnel *pft = NULL;
> struct rte_port *port;
> + int ret;
>
> if (port_id_is_invalid(port_id,
> ENABLED_WARN) ||
> port_id == (portid_t)RTE_PORT_ALL)
> @@ -2037,10 +2038,11 @@
> port_flow_validate(portid_t port_id,
> if (pft->actions)
> actions = pft->actions;
> }
> - if (rte_flow_validate(port_id, attr,
> pattern, actions, &error))
> - return
> port_flow_complain(&error);
> + ret = rte_flow_validate(port_id, attr,
> pattern, actions, &error);
> if (tunnel_ops->enabled)
>
> port_flow_tunnel_offload_cmd_release(
> port_id, tunnel_ops, pft);
> + if (ret)
> + return
> port_flow_complain(&error);
> printf("Flow rule validated\n");
> return 0;
> }
> --
> 2.33.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] app/testpmd: fix tunnel offload validation
2021-11-17 8:57 ` Gregory Etelson
@ 2021-11-17 10:09 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-11-17 10:18 ` Singh, Aman Deep
2021-11-17 10:27 ` Slava Ovsiienko
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Ferruh Yigit @ 2021-11-17 10:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gregory Etelson, dev, Ori Kam, Viacheslav Ovsiienko
Cc: Matan Azrad, Raslan Darawsheh, NBU-Contact-Thomas Monjalon
On 11/17/2021 8:57 AM, Gregory Etelson wrote:
> Hello Ferruh,
>
> Can you estimate when this patch will be merged into 21.11 ?
>
Hi Gregory,
It is not merged because it is missing review.
Ori, Slava, can you please help with the review?
> Thank you.
>
> Regards,
> Gregory
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Gregory Etelson <getelson@nvidia.com>
>> Sent: Tuesday, November 2, 2021 14:24
>> To: dev@dpdk.org; Gregory Etelson
>> <getelson@nvidia.com>
>> Cc: Matan Azrad <matan@nvidia.com>; Raslan
>> Darawsheh <rasland@nvidia.com>;
>> stable@dpdk.org; Xiaoyun Li
>> <xiaoyun.li@intel.com>
>> Subject: [PATCH] app/testpmd: fix tunnel offload
>> validation
>>
>> Tunnel offload API allows application to restore
>> packet to
>> its original form if chain of flows missed after
>> DECAP action.
>> The main idea of the tunnel offload API was to
>> query port PMD
>> to provide flow elements - actions or items.
>> Flow elements supplied by PMD are merged with
>> original flow rule
>> elements provided by testpmd operator to
>> create a new flow rule,
>> optimal for PMD, to implement the tunnel
>> offload API.
>> That flow rule transformation is hidden form
>> testpmd operator and uses
>> internal testpmd resources.
>>
>> Current testpmd did not release tunnel offload
>> resources if flow rule
>> validation failed.
>>
>> The patch always releases tunnel offload
>> resources after flow rule
>> validation returns.
>>
>> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>>
>> Fixes: 1b9f274623b8 ("app/testpmd: add
>> commands for tunnel offload")
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Gregory Etelson
>> <getelson@nvidia.com>
>> ---
>> app/test-pmd/config.c | 6 ++++--
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/app/test-pmd/config.c b/app/test-
>> pmd/config.c
>> index a18871d461..4870aaeba6 100644
>> --- a/app/test-pmd/config.c
>> +++ b/app/test-pmd/config.c
>> @@ -2011,6 +2011,7 @@
>> port_flow_validate(portid_t port_id,
>> struct rte_flow_error error;
>> struct port_flow_tunnel *pft = NULL;
>> struct rte_port *port;
>> + int ret;
>>
>> if (port_id_is_invalid(port_id,
>> ENABLED_WARN) ||
>> port_id == (portid_t)RTE_PORT_ALL)
>> @@ -2037,10 +2038,11 @@
>> port_flow_validate(portid_t port_id,
>> if (pft->actions)
>> actions = pft->actions;
>> }
>> - if (rte_flow_validate(port_id, attr,
>> pattern, actions, &error))
>> - return
>> port_flow_complain(&error);
>> + ret = rte_flow_validate(port_id, attr,
>> pattern, actions, &error);
>> if (tunnel_ops->enabled)
>>
>> port_flow_tunnel_offload_cmd_release(
>> port_id, tunnel_ops, pft);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return
>> port_flow_complain(&error);
>> printf("Flow rule validated\n");
>> return 0;
>> }
>> --
>> 2.33.1
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] app/testpmd: fix tunnel offload validation
2021-11-17 10:09 ` Ferruh Yigit
@ 2021-11-17 10:18 ` Singh, Aman Deep
2021-11-17 10:27 ` Slava Ovsiienko
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Singh, Aman Deep @ 2021-11-17 10:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ferruh Yigit, Gregory Etelson, dev, Ori Kam, Viacheslav Ovsiienko
Cc: Matan Azrad, Raslan Darawsheh, NBU-Contact-Thomas Monjalon
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3103 bytes --]
On 11/17/2021 3:39 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> On 11/17/2021 8:57 AM, Gregory Etelson wrote:
>> Hello Ferruh,
>>
>> Can you estimate when this patch will be merged into 21.11 ?
>>
>
> Hi Gregory,
>
> It is not merged because it is missing review.
>
> Ori, Slava, can you please help with the review?
>
>
>> Thank you.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Gregory
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Gregory Etelson <getelson@nvidia.com>
>>> Sent: Tuesday, November 2, 2021 14:24
>>> To: dev@dpdk.org; Gregory Etelson
>>> <getelson@nvidia.com>
>>> Cc: Matan Azrad <matan@nvidia.com>; Raslan
>>> Darawsheh <rasland@nvidia.com>;
>>> stable@dpdk.org; Xiaoyun Li
>>> <xiaoyun.li@intel.com>
>>> Subject: [PATCH] app/testpmd: fix tunnel offload
>>> validation
>>>
>>> Tunnel offload API allows application to restore
>>> packet to
>>> its original form if chain of flows missed after
>>> DECAP action.
>>> The main idea of the tunnel offload API was to
>>> query port PMD
>>> to provide flow elements - actions or items.
>>> Flow elements supplied by PMD are merged with
>>> original flow rule
>>> elements provided by testpmd operator to
>>> create a new flow rule,
>>> optimal for PMD, to implement the tunnel
>>> offload API.
>>> That flow rule transformation is hidden form
>>> testpmd operator and uses
>>> internal testpmd resources.
>>>
>>> Current testpmd did not release tunnel offload
>>> resources if flow rule
>>> validation failed.
>>>
>>> The patch always releases tunnel offload
>>> resources after flow rule
>>> validation returns.
>>>
>>> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>>>
>>> Fixes: 1b9f274623b8 ("app/testpmd: add
>>> commands for tunnel offload")
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Gregory Etelson
>>> <getelson@nvidia.com>
>>> ---
>>> app/test-pmd/config.c | 6 ++++--
>>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/app/test-pmd/config.c b/app/test-
>>> pmd/config.c
>>> index a18871d461..4870aaeba6 100644
>>> --- a/app/test-pmd/config.c
>>> +++ b/app/test-pmd/config.c
>>> @@ -2011,6 +2011,7 @@
>>> port_flow_validate(portid_t port_id,
>>> struct rte_flow_error error;
>>> struct port_flow_tunnel *pft = NULL;
>>> struct rte_port *port;
>>> + int ret;
>>>
>>> if (port_id_is_invalid(port_id,
>>> ENABLED_WARN) ||
>>> port_id == (portid_t)RTE_PORT_ALL)
>>> @@ -2037,10 +2038,11 @@
>>> port_flow_validate(portid_t port_id,
>>> if (pft->actions)
>>> actions = pft->actions;
>>> }
>>> - if (rte_flow_validate(port_id, attr,
>>> pattern, actions, &error))
>>> - return
>>> port_flow_complain(&error);
>>> + ret = rte_flow_validate(port_id, attr,
>>> pattern, actions, &error);
>>> if (tunnel_ops->enabled)
>>>
>>> port_flow_tunnel_offload_cmd_release(
>>> port_id, tunnel_ops, pft);
>>> + if (ret)
>>> + return
>>> port_flow_complain(&error);
>>> printf("Flow rule validated\n");
>>> return 0;
>>> }
>>> --
>>> 2.33.1
>>
>
> Acked-by: Aman Deep Singh <aman.deep.singh@intel.com>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 7524 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* RE: [PATCH] app/testpmd: fix tunnel offload validation
2021-11-17 10:09 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-11-17 10:18 ` Singh, Aman Deep
@ 2021-11-17 10:27 ` Slava Ovsiienko
2021-11-17 12:26 ` Ferruh Yigit
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Slava Ovsiienko @ 2021-11-17 10:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ferruh Yigit, Gregory Etelson, dev, Ori Kam
Cc: Matan Azrad, Raslan Darawsheh, NBU-Contact-Thomas Monjalon
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2021 12:10
> To: Gregory Etelson <getelson@nvidia.com>; dev@dpdk.org; Ori Kam
> <orika@nvidia.com>; Slava Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@nvidia.com>
> Cc: Matan Azrad <matan@nvidia.com>; Raslan Darawsheh
> <rasland@nvidia.com>; NBU-Contact-Thomas Monjalon
> <thomas@monjalon.net>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] app/testpmd: fix tunnel offload validation
>
> On 11/17/2021 8:57 AM, Gregory Etelson wrote:
> > Hello Ferruh,
> >
> > Can you estimate when this patch will be merged into 21.11 ?
> >
>
> Hi Gregory,
>
> It is not merged because it is missing review.
>
> Ori, Slava, can you please help with the review?
>
>
> > Thank you.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Gregory
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Gregory Etelson <getelson@nvidia.com>
> >> Sent: Tuesday, November 2, 2021 14:24
> >> To: dev@dpdk.org; Gregory Etelson
> >> <getelson@nvidia.com>
> >> Cc: Matan Azrad <matan@nvidia.com>; Raslan Darawsheh
> >> <rasland@nvidia.com>; stable@dpdk.org; Xiaoyun Li
> >> <xiaoyun.li@intel.com>
> >> Subject: [PATCH] app/testpmd: fix tunnel offload validation
> >>
> >> Tunnel offload API allows application to restore packet to its
> >> original form if chain of flows missed after DECAP action.
> >> The main idea of the tunnel offload API was to query port PMD to
> >> provide flow elements - actions or items.
> >> Flow elements supplied by PMD are merged with original flow rule
> >> elements provided by testpmd operator to create a new flow rule,
> >> optimal for PMD, to implement the tunnel offload API.
> >> That flow rule transformation is hidden form testpmd operator and
> >> uses internal testpmd resources.
> >>
> >> Current testpmd did not release tunnel offload resources if flow rule
> >> validation failed.
> >>
> >> The patch always releases tunnel offload resources after flow rule
> >> validation returns.
> >>
> >> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> >>
> >> Fixes: 1b9f274623b8 ("app/testpmd: add commands for tunnel offload")
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Gregory Etelson
> >> <getelson@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Viacheslav Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@nvidia.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] app/testpmd: fix tunnel offload validation
2021-11-17 10:27 ` Slava Ovsiienko
@ 2021-11-17 12:26 ` Ferruh Yigit
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Ferruh Yigit @ 2021-11-17 12:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Slava Ovsiienko, Gregory Etelson, dev, Ori Kam
Cc: Matan Azrad, Raslan Darawsheh, NBU-Contact-Thomas Monjalon
On 11/17/2021 10:27 AM, Slava Ovsiienko wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
>> Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2021 12:10
>> To: Gregory Etelson <getelson@nvidia.com>; dev@dpdk.org; Ori Kam
>> <orika@nvidia.com>; Slava Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@nvidia.com>
>> Cc: Matan Azrad <matan@nvidia.com>; Raslan Darawsheh
>> <rasland@nvidia.com>; NBU-Contact-Thomas Monjalon
>> <thomas@monjalon.net>
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] app/testpmd: fix tunnel offload validation
>>
>> On 11/17/2021 8:57 AM, Gregory Etelson wrote:
>>> Hello Ferruh,
>>>
>>> Can you estimate when this patch will be merged into 21.11 ?
>>>
>>
>> Hi Gregory,
>>
>> It is not merged because it is missing review.
>>
>> Ori, Slava, can you please help with the review?
>>
>>
>>> Thank you.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Gregory
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Gregory Etelson <getelson@nvidia.com>
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, November 2, 2021 14:24
>>>> To: dev@dpdk.org; Gregory Etelson
>>>> <getelson@nvidia.com>
>>>> Cc: Matan Azrad <matan@nvidia.com>; Raslan Darawsheh
>>>> <rasland@nvidia.com>; stable@dpdk.org; Xiaoyun Li
>>>> <xiaoyun.li@intel.com>
>>>> Subject: [PATCH] app/testpmd: fix tunnel offload validation
>>>>
>>>> Tunnel offload API allows application to restore packet to its
>>>> original form if chain of flows missed after DECAP action.
>>>> The main idea of the tunnel offload API was to query port PMD to
>>>> provide flow elements - actions or items.
>>>> Flow elements supplied by PMD are merged with original flow rule
>>>> elements provided by testpmd operator to create a new flow rule,
>>>> optimal for PMD, to implement the tunnel offload API.
>>>> That flow rule transformation is hidden form testpmd operator and
>>>> uses internal testpmd resources.
>>>>
>>>> Current testpmd did not release tunnel offload resources if flow rule
>>>> validation failed.
>>>>
>>>> The patch always releases tunnel offload resources after flow rule
>>>> validation returns.
>>>>
>>>> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: 1b9f274623b8 ("app/testpmd: add commands for tunnel offload")
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Gregory Etelson
>>>> <getelson@nvidia.com>
> Reviewed-by: Viacheslav Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@nvidia.com>
>
>
Applied to dpdk-next-net/main, thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-11-17 12:26 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-11-02 12:24 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] app/testpmd: fix tunnel offload validation Gregory Etelson
2021-11-17 8:57 ` Gregory Etelson
2021-11-17 10:09 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-11-17 10:18 ` Singh, Aman Deep
2021-11-17 10:27 ` Slava Ovsiienko
2021-11-17 12:26 ` Ferruh Yigit
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).