From: Raslan Darawsheh <rasland@nvidia.com>
To: Bassam Zaid AlKilani <bzalkilani@nvidia.com>,
"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: "rzidane@nvidia.com" <rzidane@nvidia.com>,
"stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>,
Matan Azrad <matan@nvidia.com>,
Slava Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@nvidia.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] net/mlx5: fix matcher priority for esp item
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2022 08:19:27 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BYAPR12MB3078AE781DF88AFFDC373B22CF6A9@BYAPR12MB3078.namprd12.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220728141203.3191-1-bzalkilani@nvidia.com>
Hi,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bassam Zaid AlKilani <bzalkilani@nvidia.com>
> Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2022 5:12 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Raslan Darawsheh <rasland@nvidia.com>; rzidane@nvidia.com;
> stable@dpdk.org; Matan Azrad <matan@nvidia.com>; Slava Ovsiienko
> <viacheslavo@nvidia.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] net/mlx5: fix matcher priority for esp item
>
> ESP is one of IPSec protocols over both IPv4 and IPv6 and is considered
> a tunnel layer that cannot be followed by any other layer. Taking that
> into consideration, esp is considered as a 4 layer.
>
> Not defining ESP's priority will make it match with the same priority as
> its prior IP layer, which has a layer 3 priority. This will lead to
> issues in matching and will match the packet with the first matching
> rule even if it doesn't have an esp layer in its pattern, disregarding
> any following rules that could have an esp item and can be actually
> a more accurate match since it will have a longer matching criterion.
>
> This is fixed by defining the priority for the ESP item to have a
> layer 4 priority, making the match be for the rule with the more
> accurate and longer matching criteria.
>
> Fixes: 18ca4a4ec73a ("net/mlx5: support ESP SPI match and RSS hash")
> Cc: rzidane@nvidia.com
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>
> Signed-off-by: Bassam ZaidAlKilani <bzalkilani@nvidia.com>[Raslan Darawsheh]
Acked-by: Raslan Darawsheh <rasland@nvidia.com>
Patch applied to next-net-mlx,
Kindest regards,
Raslan Darawsheh
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-17 8:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-28 14:12 Bassam ZaidAlKilani
2022-08-17 7:21 ` Slava Ovsiienko
2022-08-17 8:19 ` Raslan Darawsheh [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=BYAPR12MB3078AE781DF88AFFDC373B22CF6A9@BYAPR12MB3078.namprd12.prod.outlook.com \
--to=rasland@nvidia.com \
--cc=bzalkilani@nvidia.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=matan@nvidia.com \
--cc=rzidane@nvidia.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
--cc=viacheslavo@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).