DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shahed Shaikh <shshaikh@marvell.com>
To: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: "stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>,
	Rasesh Mody <rmody@marvell.com>,
	Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] net/qede: fix performance bottleneck in Rx path
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2019 16:13:16 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <BYAPR18MB2696B332DE4CBCC534009154D39C0@BYAPR18MB2696.namprd18.prod.outlook.com> (raw)



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
> Sent: Friday, January 18, 2019 8:11 PM
> To: Shahed Shaikh <shshaikh@marvell.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org; Rasesh Mody <rmody@marvell.com>; Thomas Monjalon
> <thomas@monjalon.net>
> Subject: [EXT] Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] net/qede: fix performance bottleneck
> in Rx path
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> On 1/18/2019 2:41 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> > On 1/18/2019 10:29 AM, Shahed Shaikh wrote:
> >> Allocating replacement buffer per received packet is expensive.
> >> Instead, process received packets first and allocate
> >> replacement buffers in bulk later.
> >>
> >> This improves performance by ~25% in terms of PPS on AMD
> >> platforms.
> >>
> >> Fixes: 2ea6f76aff40 ("qede: add core driver")
> >> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Shahed Shaikh <shshaikh@marvell.com>
> >
> > Hi Shahed,
> >
> > This patch has been sent same day of the RC3, very close to the actual release,
> > and updating data path of the driver, so not a trivial patch.
> >
> > Although I tend to accept driver patches late in process this one was too late,
> > you won't have proper time to fix if any errors detected, but also I can see it
> > has a good amount performance effect.
> >
> > I would like to explicitly ask if you are willing to take the risk. If answer is
> > yes, please also be sure to get Rasesh's ack.

Hi Ferruh,

We have done thorough regression testing with this series and would like to get this included in 19.02.
Please consider this series.

Rasesh,
Please ack this series.

Thanks,
Shahed
> 
> cc'ed Thomas.

             reply	other threads:[~2019-01-18 16:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-01-18 16:13 Shahed Shaikh [this message]
2019-01-18 17:15 ` Rasesh Mody
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-01-18 10:29 Shahed Shaikh
2019-01-18 14:41 ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-01-18 14:41   ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-01-18 16:57 ` Rasesh Mody
2019-01-18 23:39   ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=BYAPR18MB2696B332DE4CBCC534009154D39C0@BYAPR18MB2696.namprd18.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=shshaikh@marvell.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=rmody@marvell.com \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).