From: "Xie, Huawei" <huawei.xie@intel.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>,
"Mrzyglod, DanielX T" <danielx.t.mrzyglod@intel.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] Added Spinlock to l3fwd-vf example to prevent race conditioning
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 23:18:15 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <C37D651A908B024F974696C65296B57B0F2F1AEB@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1800110.lhpGsJ8ic2@xps13>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Monjalon
> Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2014 3:57 PM
> To: Mrzyglod, DanielX T
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] Added Spinlock to l3fwd-vf example to prevent
> race conditioning
>
> Hi Daniel,
>
> This old patch is probably good but I'd like you explain it please.
> Reviewers are also welcome.
>
> Thanks
> --
> Thomas
>
> 2014-07-23 10:33, Thomas Monjalon:
> > Hi Daniel,
> >
> > Some explanations are missing here.
> >
> > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Mrzyglod <danielx.t.mrzyglod@intel.com>
> > >
> > > --- a/examples/l3fwd-vf/main.c
> > > +++ b/examples/l3fwd-vf/main.c
> > > @@ -54,6 +54,7 @@
> > > #include <rte_per_lcore.h>
> > > #include <rte_launch.h>
> > > #include <rte_atomic.h>
> > > +#include <rte_spinlock.h>
> > > #include <rte_cycles.h>
> > > #include <rte_prefetch.h>
> > > #include <rte_lcore.h>
> > > @@ -328,7 +329,7 @@ struct lcore_conf {
> > > } __rte_cache_aligned;
> > >
> > > static struct lcore_conf lcore_conf[RTE_MAX_LCORE];
> > > -
> > > +static rte_spinlock_t
> spinlock_conf[RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS]={RTE_SPINLOCK_INITIALIZER};
> > > /* Send burst of packets on an output interface */
> > > static inline int
> > > send_burst(struct lcore_conf *qconf, uint16_t n, uint8_t port)
> > > @@ -340,7 +341,10 @@ send_burst(struct lcore_conf *qconf, uint16_t n,
> uint8_t port)
> > > queueid = qconf->tx_queue_id;
> > > m_table = (struct rte_mbuf **)qconf->tx_mbufs[port].m_table;
> > >
> > > + rte_spinlock_lock(&spinlock_conf[port]) ;
> > > ret = rte_eth_tx_burst(port, queueid, m_table, n);
> > > + rte_spinlock_unlock(&spinlock_conf[port]);
It might not be good choice for here, but how about we also provide spin_trylock as alternative API?
> > > +
> > > if (unlikely(ret < n)) {
> > > do {
> > > rte_pktmbuf_free(m_table[ret]);
> > >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-11 23:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-08 11:16 Daniel Mrzyglod
2014-07-23 8:33 ` Thomas Monjalon
2014-11-11 22:56 ` Thomas Monjalon
2014-11-11 23:18 ` Xie, Huawei [this message]
2014-12-08 14:45 ` [dpdk-dev] " Neil Horman
2014-12-10 8:18 ` Wodkowski, PawelX
2014-12-10 14:47 ` Neil Horman
2014-12-10 14:54 ` Bruce Richardson
2014-12-10 15:53 ` Mrzyglod, DanielX T
2014-12-10 16:16 ` Neil Horman
2014-12-10 23:38 ` Stephen Hemminger
2014-12-11 0:34 ` Neil Horman
2014-12-10 10:53 ` Thomas Monjalon
2014-12-11 1:08 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=C37D651A908B024F974696C65296B57B0F2F1AEB@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com \
--to=huawei.xie@intel.com \
--cc=danielx.t.mrzyglod@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).