[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] lib/librte_pmd_virtio fix can't receive packets after rx_q is empty

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] lib/librte_pmd_virtio fix can't receive packets after rx_q is empty

[linhaifeng]

From: Linhaifeng <haifeng.lin@huawei.com>

If failed to alloc mbuf ring_size times the rx_q may be empty and can't
receive any packets forever because nb_used is 0 forever.

so we should try to refill when nb_used is 0.After otherone free mbuf
we can restart to receive packets.

Signed-off-by: Linhaifeng <haifeng.lin@huawei.com>
---
 lib/librte_pmd_virtio/virtio_rxtx.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/lib/librte_pmd_virtio/virtio_rxtx.c b/lib/librte_pmd_virtio/virtio_rxtx.c
index 1d74b34..5c7e0cd 100644
--- a/lib/librte_pmd_virtio/virtio_rxtx.c
+++ b/lib/librte_pmd_virtio/virtio_rxtx.c
@@ -495,7 +495,7 @@ virtio_recv_pkts(void *rx_queue, struct rte_mbuf **rx_pkts, uint16_t nb_pkts)
 		num = num - ((rxvq->vq_used_cons_idx + num) % DESC_PER_CACHELINE);
 
 	if (num == 0)
-		return 0;
+		goto refill;
 
 	num = virtqueue_dequeue_burst_rx(rxvq, rcv_pkts, len, num);
 	PMD_RX_LOG(DEBUG, "used:%d dequeue:%d", nb_used, num);
@@ -536,6 +536,7 @@ virtio_recv_pkts(void *rx_queue, struct rte_mbuf **rx_pkts, uint16_t nb_pkts)
 
 	rxvq->packets += nb_rx;
 
+refill:
 	/* Allocate new mbuf for the used descriptor */
 	error = ENOSPC;
 	while (likely(!virtqueue_full(rxvq))) {
-- 
1.8.5.2.msysgit.0

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] lib/librte_pmd_virtio fix can't receive packets after rx_q is empty

[Xie, Huawei]

On 3/20/2015 6:47 PM, linhaifeng wrote:
> From: Linhaifeng <haifeng.lin@huawei.com>
>
> If failed to alloc mbuf ring_size times the rx_q may be empty and can't
> receive any packets forever because nb_used is 0 forever.
Agreed. In current implementation, once VQ becomes empty, we have no
chance to refill it again.
The simple fix is, receive one and then refill one as other PMDs. Need
to consider which is best strategy in terms of performance in future.
How did you find this? through code review or real workload?
> so we should try to refill when nb_used is 0.After otherone free mbuf
> we can restart to receive packets.
>
> Signed-off-by: Linhaifeng <haifeng.lin@huawei.com>
> ---
>  lib/librte_pmd_virtio/virtio_rxtx.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/librte_pmd_virtio/virtio_rxtx.c b/lib/librte_pmd_virtio/virtio_rxtx.c
> index 1d74b34..5c7e0cd 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_pmd_virtio/virtio_rxtx.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_pmd_virtio/virtio_rxtx.c
> @@ -495,7 +495,7 @@ virtio_recv_pkts(void *rx_queue, struct rte_mbuf **rx_pkts, uint16_t nb_pkts)
>  		num = num - ((rxvq->vq_used_cons_idx + num) % DESC_PER_CACHELINE);
>  
>  	if (num == 0)
> -		return 0;
> +		goto refill;
>  
>  	num = virtqueue_dequeue_burst_rx(rxvq, rcv_pkts, len, num);
>  	PMD_RX_LOG(DEBUG, "used:%d dequeue:%d", nb_used, num);
> @@ -536,6 +536,7 @@ virtio_recv_pkts(void *rx_queue, struct rte_mbuf **rx_pkts, uint16_t nb_pkts)
>  
>  	rxvq->packets += nb_rx;
>  
> +refill:
>  	/* Allocate new mbuf for the used descriptor */
>  	error = ENOSPC;
>  	while (likely(!virtqueue_full(rxvq))) {

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] lib/librte_pmd_virtio fix can't receive packets after rx_q is empty

[Linhaifeng]

On 2015/3/21 0:54, Xie, Huawei wrote:
> On 3/20/2015 6:47 PM, linhaifeng wrote:
>> From: Linhaifeng <haifeng.lin@huawei.com>
>>
>> If failed to alloc mbuf ring_size times the rx_q may be empty and can't
>> receive any packets forever because nb_used is 0 forever.
> Agreed. In current implementation, once VQ becomes empty, we have no
> chance to refill it again.
> The simple fix is, receive one and then refill one as other PMDs. Need
> to consider which is best strategy in terms of performance in future.
> How did you find this? through code review or real workload?

We found this through real workload which use vhost_net + virtio_pmd to forward packets in VM.

>> so we should try to refill when nb_used is 0.After otherone free mbuf
>> we can restart to receive packets.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Linhaifeng <haifeng.lin@huawei.com>
>> ---
>>  lib/librte_pmd_virtio/virtio_rxtx.c | 3 ++-
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/lib/librte_pmd_virtio/virtio_rxtx.c b/lib/librte_pmd_virtio/virtio_rxtx.c
>> index 1d74b34..5c7e0cd 100644
>> --- a/lib/librte_pmd_virtio/virtio_rxtx.c
>> +++ b/lib/librte_pmd_virtio/virtio_rxtx.c
>> @@ -495,7 +495,7 @@ virtio_recv_pkts(void *rx_queue, struct rte_mbuf **rx_pkts, uint16_t nb_pkts)
>>  		num = num - ((rxvq->vq_used_cons_idx + num) % DESC_PER_CACHELINE);
>>  
>>  	if (num == 0)
>> -		return 0;
>> +		goto refill;
>>  
>>  	num = virtqueue_dequeue_burst_rx(rxvq, rcv_pkts, len, num);
>>  	PMD_RX_LOG(DEBUG, "used:%d dequeue:%d", nb_used, num);
>> @@ -536,6 +536,7 @@ virtio_recv_pkts(void *rx_queue, struct rte_mbuf **rx_pkts, uint16_t nb_pkts)
>>  
>>  	rxvq->packets += nb_rx;
>>  
>> +refill:
>>  	/* Allocate new mbuf for the used descriptor */
>>  	error = ENOSPC;
>>  	while (likely(!virtqueue_full(rxvq))) {
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Regards,
Haifeng

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] lib/librte_pmd_virtio fix can't receive packets after rx_q is empty

[Linhaifeng]

On 2015/3/21 0:54, Xie, Huawei wrote:
> On 3/20/2015 6:47 PM, linhaifeng wrote:
>> From: Linhaifeng <haifeng.lin@huawei.com>
>>
>> If failed to alloc mbuf ring_size times the rx_q may be empty and can't
>> receive any packets forever because nb_used is 0 forever.
> Agreed. In current implementation, once VQ becomes empty, we have no
> chance to refill it again.
> The simple fix is, receive one and then refill one as other PMDs. Need

"Receive one and then refill one" also have this problem.If refill also
failed the VQ would be empty too.

> to consider which is best strategy in terms of performance in future.
> How did you find this? through code review or real workload?
>> so we should try to refill when nb_used is 0.After otherone free mbuf
>> we can restart to receive packets.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Linhaifeng <haifeng.lin@huawei.com>
>> ---
>>  lib/librte_pmd_virtio/virtio_rxtx.c | 3 ++-
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/lib/librte_pmd_virtio/virtio_rxtx.c b/lib/librte_pmd_virtio/virtio_rxtx.c
>> index 1d74b34..5c7e0cd 100644
>> --- a/lib/librte_pmd_virtio/virtio_rxtx.c
>> +++ b/lib/librte_pmd_virtio/virtio_rxtx.c
>> @@ -495,7 +495,7 @@ virtio_recv_pkts(void *rx_queue, struct rte_mbuf **rx_pkts, uint16_t nb_pkts)
>>  		num = num - ((rxvq->vq_used_cons_idx + num) % DESC_PER_CACHELINE);
>>  
>>  	if (num == 0)
>> -		return 0;
>> +		goto refill;
>>  
>>  	num = virtqueue_dequeue_burst_rx(rxvq, rcv_pkts, len, num);
>>  	PMD_RX_LOG(DEBUG, "used:%d dequeue:%d", nb_used, num);
>> @@ -536,6 +536,7 @@ virtio_recv_pkts(void *rx_queue, struct rte_mbuf **rx_pkts, uint16_t nb_pkts)
>>  
>>  	rxvq->packets += nb_rx;
>>  
>> +refill:
>>  	/* Allocate new mbuf for the used descriptor */
>>  	error = ENOSPC;
>>  	while (likely(!virtqueue_full(rxvq))) {
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Regards,
Haifeng

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] lib/librte_pmd_virtio fix can't receive packets after rx_q is empty

[Xie, Huawei]

On 3/21/2015 10:25 AM, Linhaifeng wrote:
>
> On 2015/3/21 0:54, Xie, Huawei wrote:
>> On 3/20/2015 6:47 PM, linhaifeng wrote:
>>> From: Linhaifeng <haifeng.lin@huawei.com>
>>>
>>> If failed to alloc mbuf ring_size times the rx_q may be empty and can't
>>> receive any packets forever because nb_used is 0 forever.
>> Agreed. In current implementation, once VQ becomes empty, we have no
>> chance to refill it again.
>> The simple fix is, receive one and then refill one as other PMDs. Need
> "Receive one and then refill one" also have this problem.If refill also
> failed the VQ would be empty too.
Correction: refill one and receive one on success of refill
>
>> to consider which is best strategy in terms of performance in future.
>> How did you find this? through code review or real workload?
>>> so we should try to refill when nb_used is 0.After otherone free mbuf
>>> we can restart to receive packets.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Linhaifeng <haifeng.lin@huawei.com>
>>> ---
>>>  lib/librte_pmd_virtio/virtio_rxtx.c | 3 ++-
>>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/lib/librte_pmd_virtio/virtio_rxtx.c b/lib/librte_pmd_virtio/virtio_rxtx.c
>>> index 1d74b34..5c7e0cd 100644
>>> --- a/lib/librte_pmd_virtio/virtio_rxtx.c
>>> +++ b/lib/librte_pmd_virtio/virtio_rxtx.c
>>> @@ -495,7 +495,7 @@ virtio_recv_pkts(void *rx_queue, struct rte_mbuf **rx_pkts, uint16_t nb_pkts)
>>>  		num = num - ((rxvq->vq_used_cons_idx + num) % DESC_PER_CACHELINE);
>>>  
>>>  	if (num == 0)
>>> -		return 0;
>>> +		goto refill;
>>>  
>>>  	num = virtqueue_dequeue_burst_rx(rxvq, rcv_pkts, len, num);
>>>  	PMD_RX_LOG(DEBUG, "used:%d dequeue:%d", nb_used, num);
>>> @@ -536,6 +536,7 @@ virtio_recv_pkts(void *rx_queue, struct rte_mbuf **rx_pkts, uint16_t nb_pkts)
>>>  
>>>  	rxvq->packets += nb_rx;
>>>  
>>> +refill:
>>>  	/* Allocate new mbuf for the used descriptor */
>>>  	error = ENOSPC;
>>>  	while (likely(!virtqueue_full(rxvq))) {
>>
>>