DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Xie, Huawei" <huawei.xie@intel.com>
To: Linhaifeng <haifeng.lin@huawei.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] lib/librte_pmd_virtio fix can't receive packets after rx_q is empty
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 10:10:50 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <C37D651A908B024F974696C65296B57B0F3F4E1B@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <550CD696.8070100@huawei.com>

On 3/21/2015 10:25 AM, Linhaifeng wrote:
>
> On 2015/3/21 0:54, Xie, Huawei wrote:
>> On 3/20/2015 6:47 PM, linhaifeng wrote:
>>> From: Linhaifeng <haifeng.lin@huawei.com>
>>>
>>> If failed to alloc mbuf ring_size times the rx_q may be empty and can't
>>> receive any packets forever because nb_used is 0 forever.
>> Agreed. In current implementation, once VQ becomes empty, we have no
>> chance to refill it again.
>> The simple fix is, receive one and then refill one as other PMDs. Need
> "Receive one and then refill one" also have this problem.If refill also
> failed the VQ would be empty too.
Correction: refill one and receive one on success of refill
>
>> to consider which is best strategy in terms of performance in future.
>> How did you find this? through code review or real workload?
>>> so we should try to refill when nb_used is 0.After otherone free mbuf
>>> we can restart to receive packets.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Linhaifeng <haifeng.lin@huawei.com>
>>> ---
>>>  lib/librte_pmd_virtio/virtio_rxtx.c | 3 ++-
>>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/lib/librte_pmd_virtio/virtio_rxtx.c b/lib/librte_pmd_virtio/virtio_rxtx.c
>>> index 1d74b34..5c7e0cd 100644
>>> --- a/lib/librte_pmd_virtio/virtio_rxtx.c
>>> +++ b/lib/librte_pmd_virtio/virtio_rxtx.c
>>> @@ -495,7 +495,7 @@ virtio_recv_pkts(void *rx_queue, struct rte_mbuf **rx_pkts, uint16_t nb_pkts)
>>>  		num = num - ((rxvq->vq_used_cons_idx + num) % DESC_PER_CACHELINE);
>>>  
>>>  	if (num == 0)
>>> -		return 0;
>>> +		goto refill;
>>>  
>>>  	num = virtqueue_dequeue_burst_rx(rxvq, rcv_pkts, len, num);
>>>  	PMD_RX_LOG(DEBUG, "used:%d dequeue:%d", nb_used, num);
>>> @@ -536,6 +536,7 @@ virtio_recv_pkts(void *rx_queue, struct rte_mbuf **rx_pkts, uint16_t nb_pkts)
>>>  
>>>  	rxvq->packets += nb_rx;
>>>  
>>> +refill:
>>>  	/* Allocate new mbuf for the used descriptor */
>>>  	error = ENOSPC;
>>>  	while (likely(!virtqueue_full(rxvq))) {
>>
>>


      reply	other threads:[~2015-03-24 10:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-20 10:46 linhaifeng
2015-03-20 16:54 ` Xie, Huawei
2015-03-21  1:30   ` Linhaifeng
2015-03-21  2:25   ` Linhaifeng
2015-03-24 10:10     ` Xie, Huawei [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=C37D651A908B024F974696C65296B57B0F3F4E1B@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=huawei.xie@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=haifeng.lin@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).