From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <huawei.xie@intel.com>
Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 193C911C5
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed,  8 Apr 2015 16:40:17 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23])
 by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 08 Apr 2015 07:40:17 -0700
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.11,544,1422950400"; d="scan'208";a="692215864"
Received: from pgsmsx106.gar.corp.intel.com ([10.221.44.98])
 by fmsmga001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 08 Apr 2015 07:40:17 -0700
Received: from shsmsx103.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.239.110.14) by
 PGSMSX106.gar.corp.intel.com (10.221.44.98) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS)
 id 14.3.224.2; Wed, 8 Apr 2015 22:40:15 +0800
Received: from shsmsx101.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.1.24]) by
 SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.4.80]) with mapi id 14.03.0224.002;
 Wed, 8 Apr 2015 22:40:14 +0800
From: "Xie, Huawei" <huawei.xie@intel.com>
To: Srinivasreddy R <srinivasreddy4390@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] packet loss in usvhost dpdk interface
Thread-Index: AdByCewsKpjJDSpGR9+awTNu85HAIg==
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2015 14:40:14 +0000
Message-ID: <C37D651A908B024F974696C65296B57B0F42E657@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
References: <CAJP4VWigbi8vBki6C5gw_wzf=Ps=jmL2qbj2J640S1RA6Y0HNg@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.40]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] packet loss in usvhost dpdk interface
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2015 14:40:18 -0000

On 4/6/2015 6:42 PM, Srinivasreddy R wrote:=0A=
> Hi,=0A=
> I have observed packet loss  with usvhost dpdk interfaces even at a very=
=0A=
> small rate  .=0A=
> This is because virtqueue [dev->virtqueue]  is found to be full,=0A=
> and my application should drop the packets .=0A=
Maybe your virtio guest is slow in processing the packets.=0A=
Could you refer to the retry mechanism in the vhost example?  search=0A=
enable_retry in switch_worker in examples/vhost/main.c.=0A=
>=0A=
> some one pls help me ,=0A=
> how can I avoid this loss .=0A=
>=0A=
> --------=0A=
> thanks=0A=
> srinivas.=0A=
>=0A=
>=0A=
=0A=