From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E83E65A24 for ; Tue, 22 Dec 2015 04:33:31 +0100 (CET) Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 21 Dec 2015 19:33:30 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.20,462,1444719600"; d="scan'208";a="878706256" Received: from fmsmsx108.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.124.206]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 21 Dec 2015 19:33:30 -0800 Received: from fmsmsx113.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.116.7) by FMSMSX108.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.124.206) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.248.2; Mon, 21 Dec 2015 19:33:30 -0800 Received: from shsmsx103.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.239.4.69) by FMSMSX113.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.116.7) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.248.2; Mon, 21 Dec 2015 19:33:29 -0800 Received: from shsmsx101.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.1.190]) by SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.4.28]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Tue, 22 Dec 2015 11:33:27 +0800 From: "Xie, Huawei" To: Yuanhan Liu , "dev@dpdk.org" , "Long, Thomas" Thread-Topic: [PATCH 1/3] vhost: get rid of linked list dev Thread-Index: AdE8aYUf0nppUANdQSG21XIvH3cclw== Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2015 03:33:27 +0000 Message-ID: References: <1450422247-6814-1-git-send-email-yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.40] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] vhost: get rid of linked list dev X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2015 03:33:32 -0000 On 12/18/2015 3:03 PM, Yuanhan Liu wrote:=0A= > While we use a single linked list to maintain all devices, we could=0A= > use a static array to achieve the same goal, just like what we did=0A= > to maintain the eth devices with rte_eth_devices array. This could=0A= > simplifies the code a bit.=0A= >=0A= > Signed-off-by: Yuanhan Liu =0A= =0A= This does simplify the implementation. Cced Tommy.=0A= [...]=0A= =0A=