From: "Xie, Huawei" <huawei.xie@intel.com>
To: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>,
Rich Lane <rich.lane@bigswitch.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] vhost: fix leak of fds and mmaps
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2016 06:50:09 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <C37D651A908B024F974696C65296B57B4C5786B0@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160107023106.GI26062@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com>
On 1/7/2016 10:27 AM, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 02:14:09PM -0800, Rich Lane wrote:
>> The common vhost code only supported a single mmap per device. vhost-user
>> worked around this by saving the address/length/fd of each mmap after the end
>> of the rte_virtio_memory struct. This only works if the vhost-user code frees
>> dev->mem, since the common code is unaware of the extra info. The
>> VHOST_USER_RESET_OWNER message is one situation where the common code frees
>> dev->mem and leaks the fds and mappings. This happens every time I shut down a
>> VM.
> That is a good catch! But I don't think it needs the complexity your
> patch has to fix it. Besides that, your patch has ABI change, which
> is not acceptable at this stage.
>
> Back to the issue, the thing is that, mmap/unmap is vhost-user/vhost-cuse
> specific, thus we'd better to handle them inside vhost-user/vhost-cuse
> differently, but not in the common path, virtio-net.c: let the common
> path handle common things only. That would make the logic clear, and
> hence less error prone.
>
> Note that we have already handled the mmap inside vhost-user/vhost-cuse,
> thinking of that way, there is no reason to handle unmap at virtio-net.c:
> it should be a historic issue while we added vhost-cuse first, which will
> not be an issue until we added vhost-user.
Agree. Let vhost-user part handle its specific cleanup and let the
virtio-net.c handle the common logic.
>
> Another note is that you should not name an internal function with "rte_"
> prefix; it should be reserved for public functions.
>
> --yliu
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-07 6:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-05 22:14 Rich Lane
2016-01-07 2:31 ` Yuanhan Liu
2016-01-07 6:50 ` Xie, Huawei [this message]
2016-01-17 19:57 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/1] " Rich Lane
2016-01-18 7:58 ` Yuanhan Liu
2016-01-19 18:13 ` Rich Lane
2016-02-06 5:23 ` Yuanhan Liu
2016-02-10 18:40 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Rich Lane
2016-02-19 15:08 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=C37D651A908B024F974696C65296B57B4C5786B0@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com \
--to=huawei.xie@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=rich.lane@bigswitch.com \
--cc=yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).