From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga14.intel.com (mga14.intel.com [192.55.52.115]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7CBD8DB3 for ; Thu, 14 Jan 2016 14:49:26 +0100 (CET) Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by fmsmga103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 14 Jan 2016 05:49:24 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.22,294,1449561600"; d="scan'208";a="890421321" Received: from fmsmsx104.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.124.202]) by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 14 Jan 2016 05:49:23 -0800 Received: from fmsmsx112.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.116.6) by fmsmsx104.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.124.202) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.248.2; Thu, 14 Jan 2016 05:49:23 -0800 Received: from shsmsx151.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.239.6.50) by FMSMSX112.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.116.6) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.248.2; Thu, 14 Jan 2016 05:49:22 -0800 Received: from shsmsx101.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.1.215]) by SHSMSX151.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.3.231]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Thu, 14 Jan 2016 21:49:22 +0800 From: "Xie, Huawei" To: Thomas Monjalon , Stephen Hemminger Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/5] virtio: Tx performance improvements Thread-Index: AdFHkIEcLZU+WrxzTSqdZam/b6/SDg== Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 13:49:21 +0000 Message-ID: References: <1445231772-17467-1-git-send-email-stephen@networkplumber.org> <2330408.2AHZ8BdDek@xps13> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.239.4.80] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/5] virtio: Tx performance improvements X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 13:49:27 -0000 On 1/6/2016 8:04 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:=0A= > 2016-01-05 08:10, Xie, Huawei:=0A= >> On 10/26/2015 10:06 PM, Xie, Huawei wrote:=0A= >>> On 10/19/2015 1:16 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:=0A= >>>> This is a tested version of the virtio Tx performance improvements=0A= >>>> that I posted earlier on the list, and described at the DPDK Userspace= =0A= >>>> meeting in Dublin. Together they get a 25% performance improvement for= =0A= >>>> both small packet and large multi-segment packet case when testing=0A= >>>> from DPDK guest application to Linux KVM host.=0A= >>>>=0A= >>>> Stephen Hemminger (5):=0A= >>>> virtio: clean up space checks on xmit=0A= >>>> virtio: don't use unlikely for normal tx stuff=0A= >>>> virtio: use indirect ring elements=0A= >>>> virtio: use any layout on transmit=0A= >>>> virtio: optimize transmit enqueue=0A= >>> There is one open why merge-able header is used in tx path. Since old= =0A= >>> implementation is also using the merge-able header in tx path if this= =0A= >>> feature is negotiated, i choose to ack the patch and address this later= =0A= >>> if not now.=0A= >>>=0A= >>> Acked-by: Huawei Xie =0A= >> Thomas:=0A= >> This patch isn't in the patchwork. Does Stephen need to send a new one?= =0A= > Yes please, I cannot find them in patchwork.=0A= =0A= ping=0A= =0A= >=0A= =0A=