From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F323809F for ; Mon, 24 Nov 2014 18:00:36 +0100 (CET) Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 24 Nov 2014 09:11:23 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.07,450,1413270000"; d="scan'208";a="637278462" Received: from irsmsx101.ger.corp.intel.com ([163.33.3.153]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 24 Nov 2014 09:11:18 -0800 Received: from irsmsx109.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.13.244]) by IRSMSX101.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.1.105]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Mon, 24 Nov 2014 17:11:17 +0000 From: "Burakov, Anatoly" To: Neil Horman , Roger Keith Wiles Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 07/10] eal: add core list input format Thread-Index: AQHQBp2c1sD94GmkkEiSs+axmHMeLZxtbj2AgAI4BoCAAB7/AIAAAosAgAAXaACAABZ4gIAADpWAgAABiwA= Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2014 17:11:16 +0000 Message-ID: References: <1416692622-28886-1-git-send-email-thomas.monjalon@6wind.com> <20141123013517.GA3982@localhost.localdomain> <20141124112819.GA11552@bricha3-MOBL3> <4662010.O9okd8Allt@xps13> <20141124132821.GA11116@bricha3-MOBL3> <54734618.1020905@intel.com> <7E169FC8-CED0-4DD1-B2DA-CAAAFFBD7231@icloud.com> <20141124170445.GA7532@hmsreliant.think-freely.org> In-Reply-To: <20141124170445.GA7532@hmsreliant.think-freely.org> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [163.33.239.181] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 07/10] eal: add core list input format X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2014 17:00:38 -0000 > On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 10:12:33AM -0600, Roger Keith Wiles wrote: > > Burn, it is not like we are going to add a huge number of new options i= n the > future and run out of letters. > > > No, but what about the application authors that need to accomodate all of > the dpdk command line options as well? > Neil Hi Neil I don't think that's a problem as all those parameters are separated with a= --. I.e. ./testpmd -c f -n 2 -- . Is that not the case= ? Thanks, Anatoly