From: "Burakov, Anatoly" <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
To: "Burakov, Anatoly" <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>,
Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] vfio: Support for no-IOMMU mode
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 16:30:21 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <C6ECDF3AB251BE4894318F4E45123697820C512D@IRSMSX109.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <C6ECDF3AB251BE4894318F4E45123697820C50F1@IRSMSX109.ger.corp.intel.com>
Hi Thomas,
> > Is it possible (is it better) to declare these functions with vfio_dma_func_t?
>
> Yeah, sure. Or maybe the other way around - maybe we could do away with
> the typedef. I'll go for the former though.
No, we can't declare the functions with a function pointer. At least I don't see any obvious way to do that without incurring multiple declarations compile error. So I'll leave it as forward declarations. Of course, the other alternative is to put the array below the functions and make them static, to avoid forward declarations, but I think it's much clearer the way it is now.
Thanks,
Anatoly
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-27 16:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-21 20:16 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " Anatoly Burakov
2016-01-13 12:36 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Anatoly Burakov
2016-01-13 16:45 ` Stephen Hemminger
2016-01-14 9:50 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2016-01-27 9:05 ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-01-27 10:08 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2016-01-27 10:12 ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-01-27 10:24 ` David Marchand
2016-01-27 10:29 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2016-01-27 14:04 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Anatoly Burakov
2016-01-27 14:23 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2016-01-27 14:32 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] " Anatoly Burakov
2016-01-27 15:50 ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-01-27 16:01 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2016-01-27 16:30 ` Burakov, Anatoly [this message]
2016-01-27 16:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5] " Anatoly Burakov
2016-01-27 17:07 ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-01-28 10:03 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2016-01-28 13:27 ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-01-28 11:57 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6] " Anatoly Burakov
2016-01-28 13:58 ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-01-28 14:16 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2016-01-28 14:40 ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-01-28 15:00 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2016-01-28 16:55 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=C6ECDF3AB251BE4894318F4E45123697820C512D@IRSMSX109.ger.corp.intel.com \
--to=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).