From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <emmericp@net.in.tum.de>
Received: from mail-out1.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
 (mail-out1.informatik.tu-muenchen.de [131.159.0.8])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 171D2C588
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue, 28 Apr 2015 13:48:27 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from charmander.net.in.tum.de (charmander.net.in.tum.de
 [131.159.20.23])
 by mail.net.in.tum.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B24CA188DA45;
 Tue, 28 Apr 2015 13:48:24 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: Paul Emmerich <emmericp@net.in.tum.de>
In-Reply-To: <E115CCD9D858EF4F90C690B0DCB4D89727297F83@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 13:48:23 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <C8F8FA83-ADCD-42D5-9F68-50F4E77E5DCA@net.in.tum.de>
References: <6DC6DE50-F94F-419C-98DF-3AD8DCD4F69D@net.in.tum.de>
 <CALgsdbciDyJLm8Rp9GNbDb6sN=eCcFEVkWsSw95fvG32mYfqBg@mail.gmail.com>
 <E115CCD9D858EF4F90C690B0DCB4D89727297ADB@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com>
 <23D2CA18-1875-4182-8DEE-9F6393011D2C@net.in.tum.de>
 <E115CCD9D858EF4F90C690B0DCB4D89727297F83@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com>
To: "De Lara Guarch, Pablo" <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Performance regression in DPDK 1.8/2.0
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 11:48:27 -0000

Hi,


De Lara Guarch, Pablo <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>:
> Could you tell me which changes you made here? I see you are using =
simple tx code path on 1.8.0,=20
> but with the default values, you should be using vector tx,=20
> unless you have changed anything in the tx configuration.

sorry, I might have written that down wrong or read the output wrong.
I did not modify the l2fwd example.


> So, just for clarification,=20
> for l2fwd you used E3-1230 v2 (Ivy Bridge), at 1.6 GHz or 3.3 GHz?

At 1.6 GHz as it is simply too fast at 3.3 GHz ;)


I=92ll probably write a minimal example that shows my
problem with tx only sometime next week.
I just used the l2fwd example to illustrate my point
with a 'builtin=91 example.

Paul=