From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qg0-f48.google.com (mail-qg0-f48.google.com [209.85.192.48]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B1C658D6 for ; Sun, 1 Jun 2014 14:06:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-qg0-f48.google.com with SMTP id i50so9011911qgf.21 for ; Sun, 01 Jun 2014 05:06:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=1GzuM7Vt5F8V1BmegczN7+cL26xG/8r6DqIgRJlTMvg=; b=f7fqXvlzjk45AJZVgo0nq7KCOHzrjL5rSZ09HpXk012hViIDQnUM+qRBSHF3iSkbF1 e4jjyIR1xucYmnc1fmjmGDu36L0gpGdUANHV68Fd76ny2N1FVT9giUvebRc7pecS9HDF kkMpsGaJr4vbEcAr67fW3nt1E82ecsbE3tEMkBdzhA09olwMdTibe6xL9Rvb1KUrCpc3 WNmWtMaT6D8ML9vSSDDSOcXM/Pwpgjm5e1IBqBZUOi9+Crg6EKvB9lh7Pk5hvaI6GMZL UtPPoTCsI2ov0N5QUu7Pvca5aQcx+O2K36/s42o9LQ68DTuYWjnvgR1pOdfvQ6cI7h4h OOPw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlEVuhPSIN5YRYgtQw9QteSKxaEpkHjo1u+B2/niANLywZfUkfdvs0NS4aTdWE8vor43liy MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.224.135.66 with SMTP id m2mr40463114qat.55.1401624382068; Sun, 01 Jun 2014 05:06:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.140.32.226 with HTTP; Sun, 1 Jun 2014 05:06:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [79.179.180.22] In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2014 15:06:21 +0300 Message-ID: From: Daniel Kaminsky To: Prashant Upadhyaya Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Would DPDK run on AMD processors X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Jun 2014 12:06:10 -0000 Hi Parshant, I ran DPDK on a system with AMD processor without any problem or any modification. Daniel On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 9:49 AM, Prashant Upadhyaya wrote: > Hi, > > Has anybody attempted to run DPDK on AMD processors. > Does it run straightforward or would there be some obvious issues where > porting would be needed, I welcome any comments. > > Regards > -Prashant >