From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qc0-f175.google.com (mail-qc0-f175.google.com [209.85.216.175]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E0DF6910 for ; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 13:09:01 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-qc0-f175.google.com with SMTP id x13so4677693qcv.6 for ; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 04:10:21 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=UrQDrvm1Wf4xRKHUbxcG6qI9v/6dFPeerfMLs1XW32k=; b=cNIBTnF1Q3J/Kz5U5jRB3t9uWX1VDg6T2raZHuNeBNs3zKdnV7tSnB3absTfyVrvzo QRCz/PQrcbaff/M8kNMXHBLEcmfwSX0kj+q4OQOgkDPZ5udL6WGUkZFRqozpnHcvL8xn T4vEYhqc6PnZ6SFZHPjSAU7PaCDq49gdn/x+Ao3hHGjGOmoOrSB0fyZ87nrOSadCU/Qq aa8UVnEe0N9IM8PLXwhmWBNDNsV8QFfnl+frTuDeQ1DC+FDqkCHlP95IlZNZM1A8vjCx DL+869ijBfaeWxzyu580J6DTu6aLnZ9UzVb0R3rm64x94HTAQegeV0jon+tdW0gAYdTN VqYg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmPZbLrcUat29FjOzfcME7YV5ifmKq0OSPo7FTe9/L+Botp6eGDhbRLUR3Md2LjT36+//HP MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.140.85.179 with SMTP id n48mr19485632qgd.91.1391083820761; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 04:10:20 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.140.28.162 with HTTP; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 04:10:20 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [109.64.22.48] In-Reply-To: References: <886FB96F-B46C-4129-A609-D80E5D1B2B5E@nyansa.com> Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 14:10:20 +0200 Message-ID: From: Daniel Kaminsky To: Prashant Upadhyaya Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Selecting Linux distribution for DPDK applications: CentOS or Debian X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 12:09:02 -0000 We're using CentOS 6.5 and Ubuntu 12.04 and don't see any issue with both of them. Regards, Daniel Kaminsky On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 12:12 PM, Prashant Upadhyaya < prashant.upadhyaya@aricent.com> wrote: > Hi Dan, > > Intel DPDK release notes(1.5.2) mention the following tested OS -- > * Fedora release 18 > * Ubuntu* 12.04 LTS > * Wind River* Linux* 5 > * Red Hat* Enterprise Linux 6.3 > * SUSE Enterprise Linux* 11 SP2 > > I have personally used Fedora 18 and it works fine for me for > virtualization including SRIOV and pass through as well as virtio with KNI > backend. > So I am tending to stick to Fedora 18. > > I don't know why is CentOS not tested and mentioned in release notes. > > Regards > -Prashant > > -----Original Message----- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Daniel Kan > Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2014 2:01 PM > To: dev@dpdk.org > Subject: [dpdk-dev] Selecting Linux distribution for DPDK applications: > CentOS or Debian > > I'm deciding between Debian 7.3 (3.2.0 kernel) and CentOS 6.5 (2.6.32 > kernel) for production. I'm wondering if anyone has recommendation. We run > the DPDK application in a virtualized environment. Currently, we configure > NICs in pass-through mode which gives the best performance. In the future, > we plan to use DPDK with paravirtualized nics (eg. vmxnet3-usermap). Thanks. > > Dan > > > > > > =============================================================================== > Please refer to http://www.aricent.com/legal/email_disclaimer.html > for important disclosures regarding this electronic communication. > > =============================================================================== >