From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-vc0-f180.google.com (mail-vc0-f180.google.com [209.85.220.180]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA51EB38E for ; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 15:17:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-vc0-f180.google.com with SMTP id im17so1944577vcb.25 for ; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 06:17:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=18GAswSYEbbMNn4Cw2Uc7ho0O3LFPeZcbiNBYvWRzew=; b=adayOpWR6WqEuqgE8qLjbXMk19yRwwCmb5Lklt9M1kU8PnCLeZUdAcdlMY29Q5jMgb 66HBZq7z3sHs0Ql5o9mZFiq2wG/aTHpRNWFdB2TR2RWIF0aWb4aYYH3I/qqBSv2YHyr+ 2CF7cyvPw2DBVGjgqgSaoGPKMZwy5vossgzeWW442dHEcBwqMZsiFuh9wiP8Vjj2MmNd wKjgarGM0mt/7ZET8/hHIx7g0bons2BRoUoIhRLfezht2wiFwO2Xsmd0krbl8mnu9vpb 2+bMUSwLLi4mxsNLTOarQrxMLnkF4B8yoK90V/sOw+pn8gGso/+wH5GHdFhU0h2hG78f I8cg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmoqxewnUn1wQiD/DIa9ATgd/83//VvMIu6GRNui8UnIeX59Xg0JKqOQt4eyHoDgCpD0XH1 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.52.17.129 with SMTP id o1mr43394095vdd.0.1405084656547; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 06:17:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.58.4.97 with HTTP; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 06:17:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <64C1698E-7B2E-4C92-9726-25B8C97CBF32@windriver.com> References: <64C1698E-7B2E-4C92-9726-25B8C97CBF32@windriver.com> Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 08:17:36 -0500 Message-ID: From: Matt Laswell To: "Wiles, Roger Keith" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK with Ubuntu 14.04? X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 13:17:09 -0000 Thanks Roger, We saw similar issues with regard to kcompat.h. Can I ask if you've done anything beyond the example applications under 14.04? -- Matt Laswell infinite io On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 7:07 PM, Wiles, Roger Keith < keith.wiles@windriver.com> wrote: > The one problem I had with 14.04 was the kcompat.h file. It looks like a > hash routine has changed its arguments. I edited the kcompat.h file and was > about to change the code to allow DPDK to build. It is not affix but it > worked for me. > > lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/kni/ethtool/igb/kcompat.h > > /* #### Changed the next line to use (3,13,8) instead of (3,14,0) KeithW > */ > #if ( LINUX_VERSION_CODE < KERNEL_VERSION(3,13,8) ) > #if (!(RHEL_RELEASE_CODE && RHEL_RELEASE_CODE >= > RHEL_RELEASE_VERSION(7,0))) > #ifdef NETIF_F_RXHASH > #define PKT_HASH_TYPE_L3 0 > > *Hope that works.* > > *Keith **Wiles*, Principal Technologist with CTO office, *Wind River* > mobile 972-213-5533 > > [image: Powering 30 Years of Innovation] > > > On Jul 10, 2014, at 5:56 PM, Matt Laswell wrote: > > Hey Folks, > > I know that official support hasn't moved past Ubuntu 12.04 LTS yet, but > does anybody have any practical experience running with 14.04 LTS? My team > has run into one compilation error so far with 1.7, but other than that > things look OK at first blush. I'd like to move my product to 14.04 for a > variety of reasons, but would hate to spend time chasing down subtle > incompatibilities. I'm guessing we're not the first ones to try this... > > Thanks. > > -- > Matt Laswell > infinite io > > >