From: Matt Laswell <laswell@infiniteio.com>
To: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Beyond DPDK 2.0
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 13:12:13 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+GnqAr=RG_hrtdm9MP5UkOt-GmOZB=HKJHJJKJG4UGgvdXNMA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADNuJVpboQq03PXHsaxEzJuORma3+ACohmxGwgKgZDAMUdBdHg@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 12:39 PM, Jay Rolette <rolette@infiniteio.com>
wrote:
>
> I can tell you that if DPDK were GPL-based, my company wouldn't be using
> it. I suspect we wouldn't be the only ones...
>
I want to emphasize this point. It's unsurprising that Jay and I agree,
since we work together. But I can say with quite a bit of confidence that
my last employer also would stop using DPDK if it were GPL licensed. Or,
if they didn't jettison it entirely, they would never move beyond the last
BSD-licensed version. If you want to incentivize companies to support
DPDK, the first step is to ensure they're using it. For that reason, GPL
seems like a step in the wrong direction to me.
- Matt
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-24 18:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-16 10:38 O'Driscoll, Tim
2015-04-22 15:11 ` O'Driscoll, Tim
2015-04-22 15:33 ` Stephen Hemminger
2015-04-23 11:36 ` O'Driscoll, Tim
2015-04-24 21:02 ` Dave Neary
2015-05-07 14:02 ` Avi Kivity
2015-05-07 14:34 ` Ivan Boule
2015-05-07 15:27 ` Wiles, Keith
2015-05-07 15:33 ` Avi Kivity
2015-05-07 15:33 ` Avi Kivity
2015-05-07 15:49 ` Wiles, Keith
2015-05-07 16:05 ` Avi Kivity
2015-05-08 4:16 ` Wiles, Keith
2015-05-08 5:29 ` Luke Gorrie
2015-05-08 9:06 ` Bruce Richardson
2015-05-08 9:32 ` Luke Gorrie
2015-05-08 9:42 ` Bruce Richardson
2015-05-08 10:02 ` Luke Gorrie
2015-05-08 14:44 ` Wiles, Keith
2015-05-08 16:16 ` Stephen Hemminger
2015-05-08 10:26 ` Hobywan Kenoby
2015-05-08 13:31 ` Neil Horman
2015-05-08 16:22 ` Stephen Hemminger
2015-05-07 15:34 ` Luke Gorrie
2015-05-08 4:31 ` Wiles, Keith
2015-04-24 7:47 ` Luke Gorrie
2015-04-24 15:29 ` O'Driscoll, Tim
2015-04-24 17:00 ` Neil Horman
2015-04-26 9:07 ` Luke Gorrie
2015-04-24 17:39 ` Jay Rolette
2015-04-24 17:51 ` Matthew Hall
2015-04-25 13:30 ` Marc Sune
2015-04-25 16:08 ` Wiles, Keith
2015-04-26 21:56 ` Neil Horman
2015-04-27 2:29 ` Jim Thompson
2015-04-27 13:07 ` Neil Horman
2015-04-27 16:07 ` Stephen Hemminger
2015-04-28 7:20 ` Dor Laor
[not found] ` <D162FA4E.1DED8%keith.wiles@intel.com>
2015-04-27 9:52 ` Marc Sune
2015-04-27 13:39 ` Wiles, Keith
2015-04-27 15:34 ` Marc Sune
2015-04-27 10:29 ` Neil Horman
2015-04-27 13:50 ` Wiles, Keith
2015-04-27 15:23 ` Neil Horman
2015-04-27 12:38 ` Dave Neary
2015-04-27 13:41 ` Neil Horman
2015-04-27 16:09 ` Stephen Hemminger
2015-04-24 18:12 ` Matt Laswell [this message]
2015-04-24 18:51 ` Neil Horman
2015-04-24 19:55 ` Jay Rolette
2015-04-25 12:10 ` Neil Horman
2015-04-27 13:46 ` Jay Rolette
2015-04-28 17:26 ` Neil Horman
2015-04-28 20:02 ` Jay Rolette
2015-04-28 6:22 ` Matthew Hall
2015-04-28 17:48 ` Stephen Hemminger
2015-04-30 21:31 Wiles, Keith
2015-04-30 21:38 ` Wiles, Keith
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CA+GnqAr=RG_hrtdm9MP5UkOt-GmOZB=HKJHJJKJG4UGgvdXNMA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=laswell@infiniteio.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).