I fixed these errors, and the clang-format version should be 17. I will send them after some discussions, as I've shared below.

There are some cases that we need to discuss. First of all, I applied the latest clang format that I created.
- In default cases for clang-format, include headers are sorted alphabetically. It improves the readability of code, and it breaks the codebase. These changes do not affect code maintenance because they are only headers.
- Second question about the column width. In the definition of .editorconfig, the column width is set as 100, but the previous commits violate this. Here is the sample code:
 struct rte_eth_dev rte_eth_devices[RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS];
@@ -61,8 +61,7 @@ static const struct rte_eth_xstats_name_off eth_dev_stats_strings[] = {
        {"rx_missed_errors", offsetof(struct rte_eth_stats, imissed)},
        {"rx_errors", offsetof(struct rte_eth_stats, ierrors)},
        {"tx_errors", offsetof(struct rte_eth_stats, oerrors)},
-       {"rx_mbuf_allocation_errors", offsetof(struct rte_eth_stats,
-               rx_nombuf)},
+       {"rx_mbuf_allocation_errors", offsetof(struct rte_eth_stats, rx_nombuf)},
 };

We could use this clang-format file only for the new patches and newly inserted lines. I am using VSCode IDE for development, and after some modification, I can select the modified lines and apply formatting. It is very useful for these cases. Otherwise, we need to handle so many things.

By the way, I am still working on macros. If you have any comments on this, I would be very happy to discuss it.