From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ee0-x231.google.com (mail-ee0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4013:c00::231]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04254594F for ; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 15:33:52 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-ee0-f49.google.com with SMTP id d17so7171073eek.36 for ; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 06:35:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=Wk7fT1ddokoBnTYeHna4ScCIK6LAax9QTbfD0NmgUHE=; b=ns5ClGdzEBNOmVR7HKzN9irRmfCjCYkJIF8ytewO+N3zWm7biV7JoME+NhOYcqJ+SF hH3LSdY71aA3UJrLGU3czKrJOpquZ6VKbOLngLeEGIrGCf1xUX7w+kDgId8+8a8Lf9/+ 5uy7QQExWs0HtQrI4rXzjDDMa2JfvftMdlQ7vKxv5X/+Dlo+UDeeSKoHKFxFv1AA4BXY vH8FaneJLaf8qw/buniVfFf/bZbrah6c83O6cc/WBjfPSqiWgxpAPTpe+ZXOV2f6RAbL PLVBIOJJH9+2Gf6/0XeAazQi5u8wRhtKditVuXBglz7+Ai6rfBwAB0eFR5kBaB94CSfk 4EHQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.15.54.140 with SMTP id t12mr230286eew.109.1392647717149; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 06:35:17 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.14.147.5 with HTTP; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 06:35:17 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 15:35:17 +0100 Message-ID: From: Mats Liljegren To: "Burakov, Anatoly" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] How to debug packet sends to virtual functions X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 14:33:53 -0000 >>> It's the latter, i.e. two primary processes running DPDK on the same VM but >>> different VF devices. The VF devices belongs to the same physical devices >>> though. >> >> I'll try that as well. > > If you need more help with how we set things up, I'll be happy to help you. I found the bug, it was an illegal arp entry that I had created causing the problem. So this case has been solved. I re-checked this ifconfig issue, and now I can get it to work without ifconfig in the guest. Not sure why it didn't work without it previously, but apparently, there is something else I did that made things work. Sorry about the fuzz, but thanks for your effort! Regards Mats Liljegren