From: Luke Gorrie <luke@snabb.co>
To: Linhaifeng <haifeng.lin@huawei.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] vhost: flush used->idx update before reading avail->flags
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 09:27:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAA2XHbef=TBAoAwNaAuVOAtHBqiQg2rD1-ExAYkHJ4pLsozJ3Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <553995DB.4000801@huawei.com>
On 24 April 2015 at 03:01, Linhaifeng <haifeng.lin@huawei.com> wrote:
> If not add memory fence what would happen? Packets loss or interrupt
> loss?How to test it ?
>
You should be able to test it like this:
1. Boot two Linux kernel (e.g. 3.13) guests.
2. Connect them via vhost switch.
3. Run continuous traffic between them (e.g. iperf).
I would expect that within a reasonable timeframe (< 1 hour) one of the
guests' network interfaces will hang indefinitely due to a missed interrupt.
You won't be able to reproduce this using DPDK guests because they are not
using the same interrupt suppression method.
This is a serious real-world problem. I wouldn't deploy the vhost
implementation without this fix.
Cheers,
-Luke
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-24 7:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-22 16:33 Huawei Xie
2015-04-23 13:57 ` Luke Gorrie
2015-04-24 1:01 ` Linhaifeng
2015-04-24 2:40 ` Xie, Huawei
2015-04-24 7:27 ` Luke Gorrie [this message]
2015-06-09 7:04 ` Linhaifeng
2015-06-09 7:45 ` Luke Gorrie
2015-06-09 8:46 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-06-09 13:34 ` Xie, Huawei
2015-06-10 2:36 ` Linhaifeng
2015-06-10 8:30 ` Luke Gorrie
2015-06-11 0:50 ` Linhaifeng
2015-04-29 11:11 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Huawei Xie
2015-05-13 10:46 ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-05-15 13:43 ` Nikita Kalyazin
2015-05-15 15:23 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-05-18 6:18 ` Nikita Kalyazin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAA2XHbef=TBAoAwNaAuVOAtHBqiQg2rD1-ExAYkHJ4pLsozJ3Q@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=luke@snabb.co \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=haifeng.lin@huawei.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).