From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16E0343F05; Tue, 30 Apr 2024 18:56:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 000404025C; Tue, 30 Apr 2024 18:56:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-pj1-f41.google.com (mail-pj1-f41.google.com [209.85.216.41]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 062A9400EF for ; Tue, 30 Apr 2024 18:56:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-pj1-f41.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-2a2da57ab3aso5038687a91.3 for ; Tue, 30 Apr 2024 09:56:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iol.unh.edu; s=unh-iol; t=1714496174; x=1715100974; darn=dpdk.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=6i0k3WYEess+Zpz6fEgpImsDSLxdnZ2yKTbs54vsfP8=; b=OpYotp3SG4FwmuaRzcIyuvK4fnzPVtNKwa60v6sNeTqvujhFBlOfGFE96/QIwm0JHY y2sfmYVF51K5lNkKkFHErhAllcx6xzW7EY/V7JBK3El2yPio/ru0Ehe1X9MFvr48gZ9C HWwQAWF4QryaPlyi1SWekNkEuZh0QHWuzsDw4= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1714496174; x=1715100974; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=6i0k3WYEess+Zpz6fEgpImsDSLxdnZ2yKTbs54vsfP8=; b=IEAKsFbFsox56lSD5n3Odf++u/uOlvySaTbZjW4eKKyEodGHdXH3Rb3wiMHN7AMeo7 ahWgA8nYZv6Yn5QsPe2vZzxiWYQ3f1+miyLQQwhLOKAUr9Xsb/PEchAyfbx6UE74gzdm 4DcxYyol0X9gPbvDZvZoJpbUKHcDYQcKzfL6mYs5KTF3+Ds0gvaktMJAVft28KHofl63 0GCI6ezFIQ5CiDz8FYQeAbwUCI7F79Dyg4m4uuYz2l6MR312v940xFI4Ba89bTy56Lou uyTZ/D0VC/UcV0keHsvLbmj/aL9dxUVEmXVIgdMTmqbpiwFQyi1KIB1zUZNwrr11X/CF Ctig== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCW40R+VwiSaWEDbGYhAzkGv/uQQQAfon4YeGw42ko+5dt+Y/2Eg6OWbDJHZ7jHuhbJHv2hLaPrmXmYMtIM= X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxCex34h/u8Ak/ki15k1J7qRUiBTs97yiQ0ja0hKxmWN9gBKmNm L0iczyl+saQR69ECA2fnUgqCNq004wq6v8JxpdjPEGxCYN55WXp6Hm2YHhT9H5WbeVx35V0BGMN a3/g9m2cSEOXoizBWxc0MhieM7WubpLaG8QoQ9Q== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFCSNsI7v0vFs+v+yuY69+pHlmYrcHgTU50b/YUrXUIpFjyksvLFPM+ScC/ElmrHkGtRV9k2glfdLcrfx75nhw= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:b93:b0:2ad:ec71:b7e5 with SMTP id bd19-20020a17090b0b9300b002adec71b7e5mr18805pjb.33.1714496174143; Tue, 30 Apr 2024 09:56:14 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20240419085108.97519-1-juraj.linkes@pantheon.tech> In-Reply-To: <20240419085108.97519-1-juraj.linkes@pantheon.tech> From: Jeremy Spewock Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 12:56:03 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] dts: rename execution to test run To: =?UTF-8?Q?Juraj_Linke=C5=A1?= Cc: thomas@monjalon.net, Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com, probb@iol.unh.edu, paul.szczepanek@arm.com, Luca.Vizzarro@arm.com, npratte@iol.unh.edu, dev@dpdk.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org +1 for the new name, "execution" in the scope of the config file gets very confusing when people start talking about their individual runs or "executions" of the dts runner. I think test runs will serve as a much more specific name. Reviewed-by: Jeremy Spewock