DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeremy Spewock <jspewock@iol.unh.edu>
To: Nicholas Pratte <npratte@iol.unh.edu>
Cc: Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com, paul.szczepanek@arm.com,
	 luca.vizzarro@arm.com, juraj.linkes@pantheon.tech,
	bruce.richardson@intel.com,  probb@iol.unh.edu,
	dmarx@iol.unh.edu, yoan.picchi@foss.arm.com, dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] dts: Rework DPDK Attributes In SUT Node Config
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2024 14:11:31 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAAA20UTO40wWqbJ66EaiDVjcNyWtADriKqgotYnSmvn10o=V5g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240613201831.9748-11-npratte@iol.unh.edu>

Funny, this commit addresses a comment I had on the previous. I think
it makes a lot of sense to split the EAL parameter information into a
DPDK specific config that the TG doesn't have since it likely won't
need it.

On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 4:22 PM Nicholas Pratte <npratte@iol.unh.edu> wrote:
>
> Rework 'lcores' and 'memory_channels' into a new 'dpdk_config'
> subsection in an effort to make these attributes SUT specific; the
> traffic generator, more often than not, does not need this information.
> Ideally, if such information is needed, then it will be listed in the
> 'traffic_generator' component in TG Node configuration. Such logic is
> not introduced in this patch, but the framework can be rewritten to do
> so without any implications of extreme effort.
>
> To make this work, use_first_core has been removed from the framework

I think it makes more sense to do this in the commit where you removed
it from the config as well and just completely take it out. There
isn't really a need to keep it in the framework in that commit so I'd
be more in favor of removing it from there entirely and then this
commit won't need to since it's less relevant here.

> entirely in favor of doing this within the LogicalCoreListFilter object.
> Since use_first_core was only ever activated when logical core 0 was
> explicitly defined, core 0 can be removed from the list of total logical
> cores assuming that it was not listed within filter_specifier.
>
> This patch also removes 'vdevs' from 'system_under_test_node' and moves
> it into 'executions.'
>
> Bugzilla ID: 1360
> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Pratte <npratte@iol.unh.edu>
>
> ---
<snip>
> diff --git a/dts/framework/testbed_model/cpu.py b/dts/framework/testbed_model/cpu.py
> index 9e33b2825d..0c315a0da6 100644
> --- a/dts/framework/testbed_model/cpu.py
> +++ b/dts/framework/testbed_model/cpu.py
> @@ -210,6 +210,8 @@ def filter(self) -> list[LogicalCore]:
>          Returns:
>              The filtered cores.
>          """
> +        if 0 in self._lcores_to_filter:
> +            self._lcores_to_filter = self._lcores_to_filter[1:]
>          sockets_to_filter = self._filter_sockets(self._lcores_to_filter)
>          filtered_lcores = []
>          for socket_to_filter in sockets_to_filter:
> @@ -328,6 +330,9 @@ def filter(self) -> list[LogicalCore]:
>          Return:
>              The filtered logical CPU cores.
>          """
> +        if 0 not in self._filter_specifier.lcore_list:
> +            self._lcores_to_filter = self._lcores_to_filter[1:]
> +

I don't really understand what these two conditionals are doing. if 0
is in the lcore_list, why do we need to omit the first value from the
filter list? Or if it is in the cores to filter why do we need to
remove the first element from that list? Also, is this attempting to
omit core 0 in the list? I think where it appears in the list can be
different depending on if the list is ascending or descending which is
different depending on the EAL parameters function it seems.
Regardless, can we add a comment on why this is needed?

>          if not len(self._filter_specifier.lcore_list):
>              return self._lcores_to_filter
>
<snip>
> 2.44.0
>

      reply	other threads:[~2024-06-14 18:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-06-13 20:18 [PATCH 0/4] dts: Remove Excess Attributes From User Config Nicholas Pratte
2024-06-13 20:18 ` [PATCH 1/4] dts: Remove build target config and list of devices Nicholas Pratte
2024-06-14 18:07   ` Jeremy Spewock
2024-06-13 20:18 ` [PATCH 2/4] dts: Use First Core Logic Change Nicholas Pratte
2024-06-14 18:09   ` Jeremy Spewock
2024-06-20 13:41     ` Nicholas Pratte
2024-06-13 20:18 ` [PATCH 3/4] dts: Self-Discovering Architecture Change Nicholas Pratte
2024-06-14 18:09   ` Jeremy Spewock
2024-06-13 20:18 ` [PATCH 4/4] dts: Rework DPDK Attributes In SUT Node Config Nicholas Pratte
2024-06-14 18:11   ` Jeremy Spewock [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAAA20UTO40wWqbJ66EaiDVjcNyWtADriKqgotYnSmvn10o=V5g@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=jspewock@iol.unh.edu \
    --cc=Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=dmarx@iol.unh.edu \
    --cc=juraj.linkes@pantheon.tech \
    --cc=luca.vizzarro@arm.com \
    --cc=npratte@iol.unh.edu \
    --cc=paul.szczepanek@arm.com \
    --cc=probb@iol.unh.edu \
    --cc=yoan.picchi@foss.arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).