From: Michael Quicquaro <michael.quicquaro@gmail.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: [dpdk-dev] glibc 2.1
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 13:25:59 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAAD-K951DjgTWDXBKACxyimP6j_vM-XN7hh8pFqfU217-6J3bg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
Hello all,
I have built dpdk (and pktgen-dpdk) on a couple RHEL 6.4 servers. This
distribution comes with glibc 2.12
I have read that glibc 2.7 is needed for coreset() functionality. My
testing, at the moment, only requires one cpu core.
I assume that upgrading to glibc 2.7 would probably break many of the
executables on this system.
The build seemed to work fine.
Do you think that there are any adverse effects of using a dpdk that was
built with glibc 2.1 in this case?
- Mike
next reply other threads:[~2013-11-21 18:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-21 18:25 Michael Quicquaro [this message]
2013-11-22 9:42 ` Richardson, Bruce
2013-11-22 15:57 ` Michael Quicquaro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAAD-K951DjgTWDXBKACxyimP6j_vM-XN7hh8pFqfU217-6J3bg@mail.gmail.com \
--to=michael.quicquaro@gmail.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).