From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <michael.quicquaro@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-pd0-x235.google.com (mail-pd0-x235.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::235])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43DBE156
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 19:25:22 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-pd0-f181.google.com with SMTP id p10so107520pdj.40
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 10:26:19 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type;
 bh=ns+a+9jUyZCjCsBWUjSZ7j8iVbOZIXiaWoBsGhq1vnE=;
 b=QORJeDjhj0iHzPyEu4vPgNdiyJ73FQWO3GPZJuEyGGHlEnEReKqI19XwEKpeNisoOI
 qZWZhG3fHNF7zEj0tr4H8Bho2laM+J+rUbzqYrdD9sdhPNXekn373bzya5HqXHUDaiyL
 h/axDPv8arsAtYupqgShHiPm0fYjw9yIYe+f+JpejCL+2ZpI5s3cjSO06sa3jJvZbVRb
 gwKsU3glW0kGdT8kaucjMTwIXUhN1FuLcj6NI5IxFru5rDnhpFOGaBNx4DuSoVWR2TfZ
 TcqQczA9cs29UVnJMqyN2W5jGGEPSm4XBgK8/jKQu+yDXOPvyQIUjqcTqbdTkUXTw2mk
 DO1A==
X-Received: by 10.66.170.168 with SMTP id an8mr7851045pac.58.1385058379735;
 Thu, 21 Nov 2013 10:26:19 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.70.69.66 with HTTP; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 10:25:59 -0800 (PST)
From: Michael Quicquaro <michael.quicquaro@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 13:25:59 -0500
Message-ID: <CAAD-K951DjgTWDXBKACxyimP6j_vM-XN7hh8pFqfU217-6J3bg@mail.gmail.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: [dpdk-dev] glibc 2.1
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 18:25:22 -0000

Hello all,

I have built dpdk (and pktgen-dpdk) on a couple RHEL 6.4 servers.  This
distribution comes with glibc 2.12

I have read that glibc 2.7 is needed for coreset() functionality.  My
testing, at the moment, only requires one cpu core.

I assume that upgrading to glibc 2.7 would probably break many of the
executables on this system.

The build seemed to work fine.

Do you think that there are any adverse effects of using a dpdk that was
built with glibc 2.1 in this case?

- Mike