DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexander Belyakov <abelyako@gmail.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: [dpdk-dev] Fwd:  DPDK testpmd forwarding performace degradation
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 10:51:35 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAAQJX_RxJZQFqc4biWBNZgbD5HuW=Y9073tV9Tp8UE3A5Ku9Ug@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAQJX_QN+HWS7k+MMw+NC3UnSKcdr-B=L1nLdOCh1br5eiYD+A@mail.gmail.com>

Hello,

On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 8:08 PM, Stephen Hemminger <
stephen@networkplumber.org> wrote:

> On Mon, 26 Jan 2015 13:17:48 +0300
> Alexander Belyakov <abelyako@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > recently I have found a case of significant performance degradation for
> our
> > application (built on top of DPDK, of course). Surprisingly, similar
> issue
> > is easily reproduced with default testpmd.
> >
> > To show the case we need simple IPv4 UDP flood with variable UDP payload
> > size. Saying "packet length" below I mean: Eth header length (14 bytes) +
> > IPv4 header length (20 bytes) + UPD header length (8 bytes) + UDP payload
> > length (variable) + CRC (4 bytes). Source IP addresses and ports are
> selected
> > randomly for each packet.
> >
> > I have used DPDK with revisions 1.6.0r2 and 1.7.1. Both show the same
> issue.
> >
> > Follow "Quick start" guide (http://dpdk.org/doc/quick-start) to build
> and
> > run testpmd. Enable testpmd forwarding ("start" command).
> >
> > Table below shows measured forwarding performance depending on packet
> > length:
> >
> > No. -- UDP payload length (bytes) -- Packet length (bytes) -- Forwarding
> > performance (Mpps) -- Expected theoretical performance (Mpps)
>
> Did you try using git bisect to identify the problem.
>

I believe dpdk-1.6.0r2 is the first release with bypass adapter (device id
155d) support and it already has the issue. So it seems I have no "good"
point.

Alexander

      parent reply	other threads:[~2015-01-27  7:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-01-26 10:17 [dpdk-dev] " Alexander Belyakov
2015-01-26 14:22 ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
     [not found]   ` <CAAQJX_RueTvfr7UnANbLSKceerkfs5DZNguKdPhSVVn9OCGtrw@mail.gmail.com>
2015-01-27  7:51     ` [dpdk-dev] Fwd: " Alexander Belyakov
2015-01-27 10:14       ` [dpdk-dev] " Alexander Belyakov
2015-01-27 16:21         ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2015-01-28 12:24           ` Alexander Belyakov
2015-01-29 12:43             ` Alexander Belyakov
2015-02-05 14:39               ` Alexander Belyakov
2015-01-26 17:08 ` Stephen Hemminger
     [not found]   ` <CAAQJX_QN+HWS7k+MMw+NC3UnSKcdr-B=L1nLdOCh1br5eiYD+A@mail.gmail.com>
2015-01-27  7:51     ` Alexander Belyakov [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAAQJX_RxJZQFqc4biWBNZgbD5HuW=Y9073tV9Tp8UE3A5Ku9Ug@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=abelyako@gmail.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).