From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-yb0-f173.google.com (mail-yb0-f173.google.com [209.85.213.173]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83D4C2BA1 for ; Thu, 8 Jun 2017 20:07:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-yb0-f173.google.com with SMTP id 202so11254011ybd.0 for ; Thu, 08 Jun 2017 11:07:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=canonical-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=EzhGa3K+k410raLczE6qriKKKLu7dnu/BhMA9WaKh+g=; b=GJ54NnJmqQ3Y37INGW9TZUTyvNtaVtk8O/C83NGLEGcT9BI66GLJqnXX9+aRIX5PsZ pLHc5uuWG4Y/AwhyI0t6LWaKYjod5WrGTsRGuvG16SXPYdf8SckDlbfqy91ubVeNBCHP swUMCF0nsXENsqKGefCycz2BvqqXIGmR+Yr6awp5ZbJ43JBwzRSCAMFAADtDVnsg7QcQ OIY+/4yr7kD/TVrllmoml+lI+2e0/r0PRNZxvGB46OLxHvFbH+w3G7JQ3PWT1oAlJqdt PhikF3hWazs3nUAerogBBhq8Gz1AXB0t8+qkdP4qFMiHOdw2LJREe/lXnHIRsE7cIdhu o7DA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=EzhGa3K+k410raLczE6qriKKKLu7dnu/BhMA9WaKh+g=; b=JQu7wXMf8QFNsOKzAe994/G3qoygNZ+WD3xr1b3izB1SaYUa298ufgQH6TPJNrbKw3 VbKMnccG95cqHkNhay6IRcOxuOvU9hELTHTbLcrxR6sZSSeH4A3mri4OSP7zeknQrdTn ZEH/fPKoTYovM8ymo38SLDDlW41SPP9vVUrHS2GcPPN8Vo+hsz2XRwS89E6KHCP4HJUe XUHWrE/G27zmZduIB+xiH1EYZ6IKu1uY7QcVD5eSr16ugPqF5NbOseFmnBBo1QfQRVUX IE19TxivkcPRSfL8JVWfqcjN5bwmRcI+VbSEN96VV6LbtUlhs4MY2VlhPQT5fu4/C5BS jpzQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcDNN1YdvRt67rfO8z09+9w1yuO3zHiL50xxCOiJWh/WLeSa3vLH hUFxv5px8ImjjEnHDBFZIbeAoJ9PmD9t X-Received: by 10.37.160.105 with SMTP id x96mr12258038ybh.247.1496945255731; Thu, 08 Jun 2017 11:07:35 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.129.93.11 with HTTP; Thu, 8 Jun 2017 11:07:05 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20170608092658.6a4bfc5c@xeon-e3> References: <20170607104743.275149-1-bruce.richardson@intel.com> <20170607162617.00d009ff@xeon-e3> <20170608085901.GC58216@bricha3-MOBL3.ger.corp.intel.com> <20170608092658.6a4bfc5c@xeon-e3> From: Christian Ehrhardt Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2017 12:07:05 -0600 Message-ID: To: Stephen Hemminger Cc: Bruce Richardson , dev Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH] replace DPDK config and build system X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2017 18:07:36 -0000 On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 10:26 AM, Stephen Hemminger < stephen@networkplumber.org> wrote: > On a side note, it would be good to use the GCC extensions that allow > building different versions of the same routine into one binary. > And we are back to the discussion we had two years ago about how to deliver generic yet also optimized binaries in one shot. But if the new build system can enable us to do so I'm all in for that. Thanks for bringing this up in that context Stephen - might be just the right time to look at it again. -- Christian Ehrhardt Software Engineer, Ubuntu Server Canonical Ltd