From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3787A0C44; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 11:13:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C7CF14105C; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 11:13:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from youngberry.canonical.com (youngberry.canonical.com [91.189.89.112]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56B99141049 for ; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 11:13:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-qk1-f199.google.com ([209.85.222.199]) by youngberry.canonical.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lVsd8-0005ys-7N for dev@dpdk.org; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 09:13:14 +0000 Received: by mail-qk1-f199.google.com with SMTP id u5so8248043qkj.10 for ; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 02:13:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=xjYY8HniWl8299wlUzpLhYHmGa9cSmT3UiXJNn+DRMw=; b=Y4K7BIEc2GkB0cfPIXvptvubgU941stuMpSZPoLhTFdHS5ytHAdY1oJlhU5GNw1PWt dprgvhy36z8uz8cGxiEv/H+yNI+RTaDZAPywlrL40vboKuMDAcTKFdH8SvWTTDTcWNvL FMnoxXrYWllIFCjekv876TV/mtmWX7yOtNcjTIspU6x2uNIvxjJX6WJqd9n2iiCfHyAa 3H84sgOXFPplRVXF8AkxVqD484t7Sh9XIfjdGqiQ4YLvW0BWe8nKDF33tp0B8GKlBg5+ N55+pX/f6skSZZvF24yKlUPgaX5AvZEEN6CVzSd+npMhvRSZG7kxEMivpLfijEWku3Za zufA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533YX+z3sg6oW3492UxmOId1GYBat/aBvfQC6uO0hwGbkZFS2Uca IBlM/W0qZ1R02hVlM8uYOVV9BHGP15e7naSxooFNC0Av83zIsQZIeWvBGSPi9+DH+C6UHcJo3kC hltU0FDxsAselDgHVaEQ0DqExcrLyBS+S9XSk X-Received: by 2002:a0c:a404:: with SMTP id w4mr27133780qvw.45.1618218793352; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 02:13:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw1MVnHlKnJOwjemToTS2Ip2jFjcuhSRHbC9Qq4LaLhzwbDCYZqx0nrxuu9+gRLRWcOExKxLdnNiG3pe7kfKf8= X-Received: by 2002:a0c:a404:: with SMTP id w4mr27133767qvw.45.1618218793116; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 02:13:13 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210409074357.2499008-1-christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com> In-Reply-To: <20210409074357.2499008-1-christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com> From: Christian Ehrhardt Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2021 11:12:46 +0200 Message-ID: To: dpdk stable Cc: dev , Abhishek Marathe , Akhil Goyal , Ali Alnubani , "Walker, Benjamin" , David Christensen , "Govindharajan, Hariprasad" , Hemant Agrawal , Ian Stokes , Jerin Jacob , John McNamara , Ju-Hyoung Lee , Kevin Traynor , Luca Boccassi , Pei Zhang , "Yu, PingX" , "Xu, Qian Q" , Raslan Darawsheh , Thomas Monjalon , "Peng, Yuan" , "Chen, Zhaoyan" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] 19.11.8 patches review and test X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Fri, Apr 9, 2021 at 9:44 AM Christian Ehrhardt wrote: > > Hi all, > > Here is a list of patches targeted for stable release 19.11.8. > > The planned date for the final release is 16th April. > > Please help with testing and validation of your use cases and report > any issues/results with reply-all to this mail. For the final release > the fixes and reported validations will be added to the release notes. > > Note: > This is a special interim release not following the releases of recent > mainline (that was 19.11.7). Instead this addresses issues with >=19.11.6 > identified and discussed in: > http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/stable/2021-March/029418.html > > Testing-Note: > The only changes this release has over the former one are about linking. > We switch back to how it was <=19.11.6 since it regressed some use-cases. > The most known one at the moment is building OVS 2.13 vs a DPDK that was > built with meson. It seems that make-based DPDK builds are unaffected. > Due to that this verification phase should not so much be about the usual > performance, functionality, ... (I'm happy if you run those, but they are > not strictly required). Instead the focus should mostly about buildability > via the various possible combinations that exist. I can confirm that with 19.11.8 the build of OpenVswitch vs a meson-built DPDK works again. Tested on OVS 2.13.3 vs DPDK 19.11.8-rc1 in Ubuntu 20.04 and 20.10 on all supported architectures (amd64,armhf,arm64 and ppc64el - the others s390x/riscv64 don't have DPDK built). > A release candidate tarball can be found at: > > https://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable/tag/?id=v19.11.8-rc1 > > These patches are located at branch 19.11 of dpdk-stable repo: > https://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable/ > > Thanks. > > Christian Ehrhardt > > --- > Christian Ehrhardt (7): > Revert "Revert "Revert "build/pkg-config: prevent overlinking""" > Revert "Revert "Revert "build/pkg-config: improve static linking flags""" > Revert "Revert "Revert "build/pkg-config: output drivers first for static build""" > Revert "Revert "Revert "build/pkg-config: move pkg-config file creation""" > Revert "Revert "Revert "build: always link whole DPDK static libraries""" > Revert "Revert "Revert "devtools: test static linkage with pkg-config""" > Regenerate meson.build changes required due to reverts -- Christian Ehrhardt Staff Engineer, Ubuntu Server Canonical Ltd