From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19E8BA00C3; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 09:06:36 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9877740688; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 09:06:35 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp-relay-internal-1.canonical.com (smtp-relay-internal-1.canonical.com [185.125.188.123]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 977C140042 for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 09:06:34 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-io1-f71.google.com (mail-io1-f71.google.com [209.85.166.71]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-relay-internal-1.canonical.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F6B03F1BA for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 08:06:34 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=canonical.com; s=20210705; t=1639469194; bh=6EFcqcUrlhVsZADuXbEQHfGT09XT7UJbVOxPB4WQOVo=; h=MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Message-ID:Subject: To:Cc:Content-Type; b=NQ1+mXbgELRWAXnX/9b8uUNggGHCoN6rTbxajORDNb9ie2ZKtGbdGgGF+Jrm/EkrA a8ZEqwqxSpiol4QeYGWgi6fZ0IkalLVuvnLhUZyQ4C6dSlpTllphlfDhbpM99RsWUK dSL5UlVJli/CtKxJxAWzr9yHzCg4HTO4VfmfN0J8As9q2ajI77VC9BCpJc6ahVfxaq BYBigghwFEi0TIlacbrW+s93myaSba7+yxwqGpPMlJGniPdCxY6POGxpVx5LF/ekM2 O1WIP5nfH+Exvx/QjScToicnBexqNDa1hDi4nefB2omLF1K+aMsmjsweuZssN+nqL+ WBCVw08kBSxaw== Received: by mail-io1-f71.google.com with SMTP id l124-20020a6b3e82000000b005ed165a1506so17079462ioa.5 for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 00:06:34 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=6EFcqcUrlhVsZADuXbEQHfGT09XT7UJbVOxPB4WQOVo=; b=y8r3Gc5BzV+l+RMrKOgickknN+Z9rUNylvz0O2rQceohGQsiCvXlCjgyxUMY9QAN2V E7Ev91nkWN+SX/kPvq6mUc3xi7MAapI6++rh5En2LdvglSxkLGteklE6fNB8dbJitLsH F0sla+Ez0wZmbfwPeS4cMBwxgkMtw5DuKUmV1pw1XhG1Tvl5frBXb09G48kFR+mlLSzt Aku5jGsU57TGuyeNzqd1ljF5Ue+Yz0yGsK0qClYDkoR2lWrr4Tv5nx5zDGLOy3PDLdUQ x40fwfilz4jDMugOT8aAMSlIfuZpaNy+WbCR9CcW6tVtMVkbRmoILdrNCObgHfkFV8TE x2DQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532hZAnKpvLncv/p3fX0UsHISJQpW7PrJYkCYDJyuIGDQpCh9QVa /bz0HAggvtRdkqmc5qaJO5oE7/QbPhWaHlS1t+VEn7A/KNTOmRkxaMBByYDv/A68osisf75GYeF PaCZ4bOXNhHU2UqigdJinYid9Dk7dmEhIlI+p X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:100a:: with SMTP id d10mr4314580qte.548.1639469182499; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 00:06:22 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwFlqcMxUJs8pBJTHuytUzhJq6a1pMqshYQ0wYQoenCb0ghZtSBHNue59gIiIMqLLjg3Fju5mfL1sf4JOSZsBw= X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:100a:: with SMTP id d10mr4314549qte.548.1639469182296; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 00:06:22 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20211209144315.3424225-1-christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com> In-Reply-To: From: Christian Ehrhardt Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2021 09:05:56 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: 19.11.11 patches review and test To: "Jiang, YuX" Cc: "stable@dpdk.org" , "dev@dpdk.org" , Abhishek Marathe , Akhil Goyal , Ali Alnubani , "Walker, Benjamin" , David Christensen , "Govindharajan, Hariprasad" , Hemant Agrawal , "Stokes, Ian" , Jerin Jacob , "Mcnamara, John" , Ju-Hyoung Lee , Kevin Traynor , Luca Boccassi , Pei Zhang , "pingx.yu@intel.com" , "Xu, Qian Q" , Raslan Darawsheh , Thomas Monjalon , "Peng, Yuan" , "Chen, Zhaoyan" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 8:45 AM Christian Ehrhardt wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 8:14 AM Jiang, YuX wrote: > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com > > > Sent: Thursday, December 9, 2021 10:43 PM > > > To: stable@dpdk.org > > > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Abhishek Marathe ; > > > Akhil Goyal ; Ali Alnubani ; > > > Walker, Benjamin ; David Christensen > > > ; Govindharajan, Hariprasad > > > ; Hemant Agrawal > > > ; Stokes, Ian ; Jerin > > > Jacob ; Mcnamara, John ; > > > Ju-Hyoung Lee ; Kevin Traynor > > > ; Luca Boccassi ; Pei Zhang > > > ; pingx.yu@intel.com; Xu, Qian Q > > > ; Raslan Darawsheh ; Thomas > > > Monjalon ; Peng, Yuan ; > > > Chen, Zhaoyan > > > Subject: 19.11.11 patches review and test > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Here is a list of patches targeted for stable release 19.11.11. > > > > > > The planned date for the final release is 7th January 2021. > > > > > > Please help with testing and validation of your use cases and report any > > > issues/results with reply-all to this mail. For the final release the fixes and > > > reported validations will be added to the release notes. > > > > > > A release candidate tarball can be found at: > > > > > > https://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable/tag/?id=v19.11.11-rc1 > > > > > > These patches are located at branch 19.11 of dpdk-stable repo: > > > https://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable/ > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > Christian Ehrhardt > > > > > > --- > > Hi Christian, > > > > We find many build issues on LTS19.11. But all of them have no fix yet. > > Hi, > thanks for the overview - that will be useful to extend the list of > known-issues eventually. > > I agree with all of those reports, and some of them are older already, > not new to the current iteration. > But they all fall into the same category as some former build issues > we have seen. > As the 19.11 series gets older it fails to build in very new > compilers/distros for the new toolchains there being more strict. > I'm happy to backport patches for those, but as always we will only > block new LTS releases if we break build(environments) that formerly > worked. Oh and I wanted to state that I tried to start an activity to get those resolved back when the first of those came up in summer. => http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2021-July/214998.html But the activity on that was ... zero :-/ So I pick the fixes that get provided, but as mentioned above - will not block the LTS unless we break formerly working builds. > > https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=744 DPDK core dev UNCO --- [dpdk-19.11.9-rc3] make build failed on Fedora34 with GCC11 and build failed on Fedora35 with gcc11.2.1&clang13.0.0 > > https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=747 DPDK core dev UNCO --- [dpdk-19.11.9-rc3] Meson build failed with ICC-19.1.1 > > https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=900 DPDK ethdev dev UNCO --- [19.11.11-rc1] net/nfp build failure with clang 13 > > ^^ this one has (900) a fix which I already picked and will be in -rc2 > > > https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=901 DPDK ethdev dev UNCO --- [19.11.11-rc1] net/i40e build failure with make and clang 13 > > https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=902 DPDK ethdev dev UNCO --- [19.11.11-rc1] net/ice build failure with make and clang 13 > > https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=903 DPDK ethdev dev UNCO --- [19.11.11-rc1] net/ixgbe build failure with make and clang 13 > > https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=904 DPDK meson dev UNCO --- [dpdk-19.11.11] Meson build has some failures on Fedora35 with clang 13.0.0 > > https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=905 DPDK meson dev UNCO --- [dpdk-19.11.11-rc1]Meson&Makefile build failed on Freebsd13 with gcc10.3.0&clang11.0.1 > > -- > Christian Ehrhardt > Staff Engineer, Ubuntu Server > Canonical Ltd -- Christian Ehrhardt Staff Engineer, Ubuntu Server Canonical Ltd