From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ot0-f193.google.com (mail-ot0-f193.google.com [74.125.82.193]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06A4C1B6C3 for ; Fri, 13 Apr 2018 17:03:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-ot0-f193.google.com with SMTP id j8-v6so10186577ota.7 for ; Fri, 13 Apr 2018 08:03:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=netcope.com; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=1LZTaCaCa9nTP7uglBKMaJQ+5XE2MyEI9yEncMLfToo=; b=bNCnaLW2YaGkB5pSP1RqNPFctIqxkOwyB8GIem9KPaSjLT/LRoohcFiI26M+XXn3Pa k3+uqBSgavvQWG9cBFWJ41B5wM6DZAOJ0e/MeRUeKlbFA3lgBT9hJyhClBBOwlTyqKuw buLNlXQ2iJ7BGTiUAhXvzS5Kj7PgIFbWortMPFjZrY/lnll+pV5aYQkoJlMUPAQMHuMP iwrayXLPIXba8jaaN3NYlf7CZBja8BxGEBWsrWTx79u/5Gk5y59IppW9rxvjZ31eGvn3 xTzo8nUfJUd57wdivSO4BWGEnzpo1+qLvH9s75wAMo4hR/Xn7RFe+/90ifEOTMzNBnaS jkFA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=1LZTaCaCa9nTP7uglBKMaJQ+5XE2MyEI9yEncMLfToo=; b=E9bdtF/p0seP3AiA6RbDbyj5vk5A8Zc6c7diznLWgKNCnU9SdcCqKp8QBI+F3Tu6jB pV/DKFL8zJIDeRTHCEGb8LRNtoozgZ4SlcwBQJEW97avswzwbNBlnwlH6mRK9ohGsk0K s7xxMhtsxgBJevGxZkE0DtgMxcMH87Iild17p65z2XLU3E9H//89466l1hgbiapwz65L aABme0gCZCykdC5skS2ruKrxjHLlZK5Wx2YqQqvPulxaSRQgHx/vCQ6IyIY9EVP8eLhs unxErWEqdGjfUNNG9uyAP4BTNTO94N/7cw+f5kIFY7QRvJ74yYfPwdIbA9D7Hw3l85Ai RA6w== X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tDjrd4/j12TjYcKzFwXZTmejx0WuYYivKYrcnnslF4taPAX8/hh 1B5hjdWAQnYmIEgjAceZs0tMNhTjbxxcDVLRS3iEAst0 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx4/e2xvwXZZkXVzqczqt/6ngGhk9BIJNPdpGn555q7OQEnS9YseO+41cIaIyrCvOLOH0UvJsZU05fn27KVaxJ+U= X-Received: by 2002:a9d:510e:: with SMTP id c14-v6mr3599668oth.36.1523631790324; Fri, 13 Apr 2018 08:03:10 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.74.151.139 with HTTP; Fri, 13 Apr 2018 08:03:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1641ecc9-0d2a-d188-90ca-abf1991f821f@intel.com> References: <1523023929-1257-1-git-send-email-vido@cesnet.cz> <1523518890-7075-3-git-send-email-vido@cesnet.cz> <6df92274-3b39-4750-0823-a234cffad048@intel.com> <1641ecc9-0d2a-d188-90ca-abf1991f821f@intel.com> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jan_Reme=C5=A1?= Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2018 17:03:09 +0200 Message-ID: To: Ferruh Yigit Cc: Matej Vido , dev@dpdk.org, fpga-sw Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/3] net/szedata2: add support for new NIC X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2018 15:03:11 -0000 It is mentioned on the website with the packages itself. The current version works with the reworked PMD - there is a headline which says: "DPDK from 18.05" (since we expect the patches to land in the upcoming release; we will update it if this does not happen). The older version is still available on the website, with appropriate installation steps and a headline that says "DPDK up to 18.02". Is this form of documentation sufficient for you or would you like to see it mentioned in the DPDK documentation as well? Thanks, Jan Jan Reme=C5=A1 | Software Developer Netcope Technologies, a.s. T: +420 530 510 680 A: Sochorova 3232/34, Brno, 616 00, Czech Republic W: www.netcope.com On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 4:26 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrot= e: > On 4/13/2018 9:17 AM, Jan Reme=C5=A1 wrote: >>> >>> Hi Matej, >>> >>> Where szedata_get_area_numa_node() is defined? >>> Is it possible that you are missing a patch? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> ferruh >> >> Hi Ferruh, >> >> the new PMD requires an updated version of libsze2 and drivers. We >> have just published the updated packages here: >> https://www.netcope.com/en/company/community-support/dpdk-libsze2. > > DPDK documentation mentions about libsze2 dependency but there is no vers= ion > mentioned. > > And I have not seen any note that says a new version of library is requir= ed, > perhaps I missed it, is there a documentation which says which version of= DPDK > requires which version of the dependencies? > > What is the way of tracing this dependency? > >> Sorry for the hickup. >> >> Best regards, >> Jan >> >