From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from na3sys009aog117.obsmtp.com (na3sys009aog117.obsmtp.com [74.125.149.242]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4F0955926 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2014 20:01:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-wi0-f181.google.com ([209.85.212.181]) (using TLSv1) by na3sys009aob117.postini.com ([74.125.148.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKU9aQXmPdywf5PlDeccPH/9WGyxmk6V1e@postini.com; Mon, 28 Jul 2014 11:03:12 PDT Received: by mail-wi0-f181.google.com with SMTP id bs8so4843133wib.14 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2014 11:03:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=1VxEXK84hYn4Rgdu12DeaqBgIr/8lq5FKYDZKaJudmY=; b=jH0cb5le9Sq4OuKuMjBtM0fOdxTjUMuorJDW0v7jHequwNc6nF5lvzQu5flm6ubKQ8 xAYrm/Dyq5F9yTzCIaH/ld1xDjG+oL4oi3RSl8af1zm0zWnY+5K35qg/cJZI7kEXllDa YYpj+aex1zBimDiLpljeO6hR6i3lmdjPPV1YBgP7HUJt/Qa+aVMjsNk/0NB1diNZXYq5 r/Mwc+kMrCE1ZGCyVRSKfHCFVMZ1p1QR1YMM2mTLTLsX2dWqe4kypnHsQ4WKeaobaUSX +RDnt2rBlbmacIDZmY54lCAzVtRC/B/4yeowbIqOUoaqUjVd69ijhfKDAdOcBQUyNqds uhqg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkYgoAORG8azQCjNWZXtL25/oBJvY+0ivK4Q75+GoDm2/Zg4JC6oGFCFlXtUpwqtHZ63+xiYvZuvdpmjs3Bcy+C3beZZ868hM0DS8Dm9oy2d+BfttkIzvFT/Aq7tiEjlRWV3J3l X-Received: by 10.180.182.161 with SMTP id ef1mr32666149wic.44.1406570590744; Mon, 28 Jul 2014 11:03:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.180.182.161 with SMTP id ef1mr32666101wic.44.1406570590378; Mon, 28 Jul 2014 11:03:10 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.52.136 with HTTP; Mon, 28 Jul 2014 11:02:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20140728161448.GA6127@nicira.com> References: <8d11521a13174f06811f621bd002ed19@GURMBXV02.AD.ARICENT.COM> <20140728161448.GA6127@nicira.com> From: Alex Wang Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 11:02:50 -0700 Message-ID: To: Ben Pfaff X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 20:38:02 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" , "discuss@openvswitch.org" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [ovs-discuss] does vswitchd runs multiple threads when i added dpdk devices X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 18:01:25 -0000 Hey Srinivas, Right now, ovs has only one dpdk polling thread. We are working on creating multiple polling threads and pinning polling threads to the same cpu socket as dpdk interface. Thanks, Alex Wang, On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 9:15 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote: > On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 07:33:35AM +0000, Srinivas Reddi wrote: > > As per my understanding each dpdk device is polled on different thread > . > > But in my case vswithcd is running in only single thread [on core 0] , > I expected to run on 3 cores .. > > > > One thing I want to clarify that .. does ovs-vswitchd runs on single > core only .. or multiple thereads .. when I added dpdk devices . > > If vswitchd runs on multiple threads , when I added dpdk devices .. pls > let me know how can I run . > > It looks like right now OVS has only one dpdk polling thread. > _______________________________________________ > discuss mailing list > discuss@openvswitch.org > http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss >