From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-la0-x235.google.com (mail-la0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::235]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 661FD156 for ; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 23:43:58 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-la0-f53.google.com with SMTP id ea20so6741203lab.12 for ; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 14:44:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=/wU2iDAVFAcA8uhw1jo88XInEe51pDjQlUi3vP4oDls=; b=ZckABBshSnqZvcHOiVKPTdLP8ruVAuSq9tnhHrH7gowNJZLEYIYAJadXgn6pH28q2v Bh4iTIIOfB8ZBx1AHTnww5eqn08gC+l0gptGYTOBp0D1q+XJgeoA8+jEFJxMEjJUX2XX mBpzYDNiJ+A+l6wvNf2/vKA+sq8byqpR3HctoKVlCwHcr5RoDFnMib9GtdB9OZIWU8hP sOQmYgMvd4vIqpsE3wgPcptJ5J185rbXdJuHpuIkMdONohcKzxuy0inA/aNtFEbdm0lJ I7k3MjazlbNfXGLkpvLawf+XfScYBZOpNvHpX5aWxyXmr2mM8De/RTt3ZvqMeCoiguto xu5g== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.87.105 with SMTP id w9mr3790828laz.27.1384901095932; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 14:44:55 -0800 (PST) Sender: decimen@gmail.com Received: by 10.112.58.201 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 14:44:55 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 23:44:55 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 9-DUSKPxHSEEd6N73ew27uhQpAk Message-ID: From: Ognjen Joldzic To: dev@dpdk.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: [dpdk-dev] 82546EB Copper issue X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 22:43:58 -0000 Hi, Recently I came across a 82546EB Dual-port Gigabit Ethernet (Copper) NIC and tried to include it in our current DPDK setup. However, the card doesn't seem to be supported (I was unable to bind the igb_uio driver). There was a post in mailing list earlier this year stating that this particular NIC is not supported as of r1.2.3. Is the situation any different with the 1.5.0 release (or are there any plans to support this model)? Thanks, Ognjen