From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7703DA0350; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 15:01:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D72431BEDD; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 15:01:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-lf1-f49.google.com (mail-lf1-f49.google.com [209.85.167.49]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDB691BEB2 for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 15:01:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-lf1-f49.google.com with SMTP id u25so11327050lfm.1 for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 06:01:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iol.unh.edu; s=unh-iol; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Q9ZN33updhL/SNYy66VLfPzn/J80w0bjLV5VTEBbBz4=; b=A4M/OS/fGWKi2RxmKP7VM4oOlYmIc1JBJ2LcOK8AkeB0JjLgrpTMgueVWH/yPweZI9 oJWlWxSSX73sdtEmFkDbSCYgpCbJaheXj2lpgFnliS3Q5BqQx/b4qHUVpUjlh9yl5onj DSJN9tBG0Wk7q4ZPHNqdIOuR1dbTHM78ffmAA= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Q9ZN33updhL/SNYy66VLfPzn/J80w0bjLV5VTEBbBz4=; b=nER8HZQrOfhzy1mhPKlxT3ZY9hUgOXn3VSIMIOKfO+gMmiXxk9yDDGcKTaRNht4mSL WN+g7GWeF/sl+ao4E2YK6UWgifd0B8BuHIJMGLMB9zKEMN3afGaHbMPovYwTwjrWghvp w5DGuCuvUc6j+eXshQ5mKQvTvk3FsIWPOiwxZi1puK029WTj667JBM94ueEPLNPbnJIr /C/vxg7b/QYzHDbqRx1wG3VgpU56rExECL11YxXa2nZvnbL+QUU5dpFE2kc6Djg/1mfd 0QGRQfILsAIrGwqJ+0rPI6zI8xul5Odkk+47aKulGVZ+l9ocESKfTxFJ4Funlm00Wo5+ gvVw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530anyZ1xUsp8wVKiXO5XusLKcJoPDe1tLexyZ4UZGpw5TOuraSt 0BY9A247jgMN9WK00RUWtjvgcOOnN4eLgP8froztPQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJww4A4xTL7lV91CffRmzAWLn2SxaiYqp0npGugQr6HD3TFdQENn1zfA3gUY57XpOjhc/BDtyLaHJUbADoRUs2E= X-Received: by 2002:ac2:5e6c:: with SMTP id a12mr12084300lfr.35.1593522098666; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 06:01:38 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <2250034.MpDbe8kn2E@thomas> In-Reply-To: <2250034.MpDbe8kn2E@thomas> From: David Liu Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2020 09:01:02 -0400 Message-ID: To: Thomas Monjalon Cc: dpdk-dev , dts@dpdk.org, Lincoln Lavoie , David Marchand , Ferruh Yigit , Andrew Rybchenko , Ori Kam , Ciara Power , Ivan Ilchenko , Hemant Agrawal , Stephen Hemminger , Raslan Darawsheh Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] RSS Key Update Feature X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Thank you for the clarification. On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 7:48 PM Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 29/06/2020 23:07, David Liu: > > Hello all, > > > > I will be implementing a test in DTS for RSS Key Update. > > http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/features.html#rss-key-update > > > > To my understanding, this feature will test the ability to configure the > > hash key of the ports. If that is incorrect, please let me know. > > > > Configure the port RSS hash key in testpmd and check if the new key will > be > > kept. Test configure the hash key that is longer than the max length and > > shorter than the max length. > > > > Then start sending in packets with different source and destination IP > > addresses. Ensure the ports are still able to calculate the hash value > from > > the incoming packets. > > Updating the key should change the destination queue of the packets. > By setting up multi-queue Rx and choosing IP addresses accordingly, > you can see packets arriving on the expected queue. > > > Please let me know if there is anything else need to be tested, > > A related test could be to read the computed hash in the mbuf metadata. > > >