From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-oi0-f48.google.com (mail-oi0-f48.google.com [209.85.218.48]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E66A67CD9; Sun, 4 Jun 2017 09:20:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-oi0-f48.google.com with SMTP id l18so130663607oig.2; Sun, 04 Jun 2017 00:20:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=sZRO60PZuaGJiVBobMfoWYZ8A1+RsLM/x2x50/lvHw4=; b=CuIOvGVGhZwn9IXHSwHFmnqX4I8xFqTJfjOWZfkIAwvVemlLj0MCullA6qyK3XG8hI dNW96CQhXhdr4UEWmb5dG66vcAWUIf9h3ruQyGRTl5n/yQhGx5lE833yqyYFAdlI0jSv C6P5/02T8FK90UpR/B1XzhM0FTgEIBg/lwIOzxpVwMmPFgzqPd4l7gd+nNiSnnOBs/3u ElSe5epc07MjRFNvKKiLoudQ1ULUym35xjXH5H3NTcwV2SmfdrgDTzsMj3dl1891c9Mw OcpeBaneCYJ9+QNh612LIitmsuFE4iVOnPzA/qpRuqMcMVmzWn6JHBXCsqbheI3xoJsb fRLQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=sZRO60PZuaGJiVBobMfoWYZ8A1+RsLM/x2x50/lvHw4=; b=I9dM5nG33d4h5VLVVSq+aicj80cMzdClhetL3PLuqwkEcC8/NT1fALkO5Z6Ls0ipQ6 9Imz8RaLb9rJUnZaRqzx6OsRSz69gWCQGWMFVV09JqiDEGAR/aqzO/8nsBgx61jioet4 NlpHlgWL8Pt4vpWhS/dW+IonjwRAd1B5LvmsL4xeN635Cr63BvuLYqt7lZ0+Wrbu4f+e 7wHkJ07hEq6VhsHf7Z71wiL/RVBVu0OsbXw5CtHelXdz7pyhXbgOwBQQcgX47oRdl4rV 85OqhYlCU7LtcznTSt+khZVZccAaA6J4D173l8XkVwCENsORNuycSFfMbxpd/dePkUUI xJwQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcABOYKtQ40YqgFLUJ6Kw8WBRW1UmaDtFm0tf0yQKxqFMYGcPXEb YbX0f4htTl3vdxxNxy5mwkii5tDbNQ== X-Received: by 10.157.30.163 with SMTP id n32mr9445830otn.192.1496560823141; Sun, 04 Jun 2017 00:20:23 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.74.73.134 with HTTP; Sun, 4 Jun 2017 00:20:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <3EB4FA525960D640B5BDFFD6A3D891267BA646BE@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <3EB4FA525960D640B5BDFFD6A3D891267BA646BE@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> From: Nidhia Varghese Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2017 12:50:22 +0530 Message-ID: To: "Dumitrescu, Cristian" Cc: "users@dpdk.org" , "dev@dpdk.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Getting meta data from different pipelines in ip_pipeline application X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Jun 2017 07:20:24 -0000 Hi, I tested it, but its not working as expected. Pipelines 4,5 and 6 are passthrough pipelines and 7 is of flow classification type. Packets are getting dropped at pipeline 7. On Sat, Jun 3, 2017 at 6:01 PM, Dumitrescu, Cristian < cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com> wrote: > Hi Nidhia, > > You should go ahead and test it. Did you test it and it did not work as > you expect? > > Personally, I cannot see any reasons why it should not work, but you need > to test it yourself. I am assuming that pipelines 4, 5,6 below have the > passthrough type and pipeline 7 has the flow classification type. > > Regards, > Cristian > > Regards, Nidhia Varghese