From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <sshukla@mvista.com>
Received: from mail-pa0-f48.google.com (mail-pa0-f48.google.com
 [209.85.220.48]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A0878D3A
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 13:46:37 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-pa0-f48.google.com with SMTP id wq6so60289773pac.1
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 04:46:37 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=mvista-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
 :cc:content-type;
 bh=FY9I7DXEEtO5siNgZ2IzM9dx6RpnyM9IzNPfDuPVihs=;
 b=y9eJCAiArxB85qXpM/H1MeaDKXTSCdghvwtbVVtDydAhFnKCcRlsKfDcnt2702tEI9
 ZUvnUefYzYaks9Fhf7tfJqwwxIlEg7RzPn+VvRbyj9C/tU+mgiI+ul/djMKKSnOU2p1v
 47i5XbEHGhcBAI6SY04KOOP0G/mKpg+6WGU7FTw8xyIB6t4w7JYKDsRWD0W8+sIzhPsm
 6EVQ7aBuv/zUC/4lpIfcnRKVBcziuSgMKk+y+8vibx/0LJu06IkltopMoL3yJWCBChYU
 LWBvVJuG8jlKKmfcNY0hj5LLfp6RNEGe5rjCDpZ8AondiGrM5kplX9rH3YL+0xK7/mtw
 yc0A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
 :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
 bh=FY9I7DXEEtO5siNgZ2IzM9dx6RpnyM9IzNPfDuPVihs=;
 b=hYGTUVKPFtbfei/WcfifIKkMLlBMhRL/hRdX0knayK3JIbyL/ngIRMPK3UwjuaRLZ8
 mpUQ4WEa+OzfEdnWd+c4N/NIokRe/v+xBr9l5G12732HZxPN6LQChY2v/siK3MK6Q5T/
 +NcejVR27igoRj/OFOongL3B5T5Rw3ON6LMb84TCW7ZozBw7MOPIVluNftEyRPG1/Y1V
 MKUJnKG33hEkjOKUXOhBFLQsZJ4a2cdN0CRCFpqRgxIinFGPHTVPgaCg9bHQIRs1Ijel
 rV0GfTlF7nEgyGdX8PzGJcJvkliIwCB+/IE6GbfD78XFpXKMgTtTE8Q48tRXwz1XVw1T
 qCpg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkW5lk+zTdfEmfA0ifspAigc61lKIEp/37wlVfgzk1Rqc8VVP6juJobi0V9ZaucuJuHZvAfl0Y73kAaZsSs5zGpgg4DFVKhfzFIhWItN5Wi7ZtpDCs=
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.66.227.129 with SMTP id sa1mr4910295pac.132.1450442796978;
 Fri, 18 Dec 2015 04:46:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.66.13.233 with HTTP; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 04:46:36 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20151217152435.3c733ac1@xeon-e3>
References: <1450098032-21198-1-git-send-email-sshukla@mvista.com>
 <1450098032-21198-2-git-send-email-sshukla@mvista.com>
 <CAAyOgsbAyU1VhPCbZ4FjMwkk8OYs8gORP=+rXbmNQOxCX2mvSQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20151217152435.3c733ac1@xeon-e3>
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 18:16:36 +0530
Message-ID: <CAAyOgsZBpkPb=_-77814q_U9MbOBQ==S3SAUp-ScAqMxV=R3fg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Santosh Shukla <sshukla@mvista.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [ [PATCH v2] 01/13] virtio: Introduce config
	RTE_VIRTIO_INC_VECTOR
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 12:46:38 -0000

On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 4:54 AM, Stephen Hemminger
<stephen@networkplumber.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Dec 2015 17:32:38 +0530
> Santosh Shukla <sshukla@mvista.com> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 6:30 PM, Santosh Shukla <sshukla@mvista.com> wrote:
>> > virtio_recv_pkts_vec and other virtio vector friend apis are written for sse/avx
>> > instructions. For arm64 in particular, virtio vector implementation does not
>> > exist(todo).
>> >
>> > So virtio pmd driver wont build for targets like i686, arm64.  By making
>> > RTE_VIRTIO_INC_VECTOR=n, Driver can build for non-sse/avx targets and will work
>> > in non-vectored virtio mode.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Santosh Shukla <sshukla@mvista.com>
>> > ---
>>
>> Ping?
>>
>> any review  / comment on this patch much appreciated. Thanks
>
> The patches I posted (and were ignored by Intel) to support indirect
> and any layout should have much bigger performance gain than all this
> low level SSE bit twiddling.
>

I little confused - do we care for this patch?