From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pa0-f48.google.com (mail-pa0-f48.google.com [209.85.220.48]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A0878D3A for ; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 13:46:37 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-pa0-f48.google.com with SMTP id wq6so60289773pac.1 for ; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 04:46:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mvista-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=FY9I7DXEEtO5siNgZ2IzM9dx6RpnyM9IzNPfDuPVihs=; b=y9eJCAiArxB85qXpM/H1MeaDKXTSCdghvwtbVVtDydAhFnKCcRlsKfDcnt2702tEI9 ZUvnUefYzYaks9Fhf7tfJqwwxIlEg7RzPn+VvRbyj9C/tU+mgiI+ul/djMKKSnOU2p1v 47i5XbEHGhcBAI6SY04KOOP0G/mKpg+6WGU7FTw8xyIB6t4w7JYKDsRWD0W8+sIzhPsm 6EVQ7aBuv/zUC/4lpIfcnRKVBcziuSgMKk+y+8vibx/0LJu06IkltopMoL3yJWCBChYU LWBvVJuG8jlKKmfcNY0hj5LLfp6RNEGe5rjCDpZ8AondiGrM5kplX9rH3YL+0xK7/mtw yc0A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=FY9I7DXEEtO5siNgZ2IzM9dx6RpnyM9IzNPfDuPVihs=; b=hYGTUVKPFtbfei/WcfifIKkMLlBMhRL/hRdX0knayK3JIbyL/ngIRMPK3UwjuaRLZ8 mpUQ4WEa+OzfEdnWd+c4N/NIokRe/v+xBr9l5G12732HZxPN6LQChY2v/siK3MK6Q5T/ +NcejVR27igoRj/OFOongL3B5T5Rw3ON6LMb84TCW7ZozBw7MOPIVluNftEyRPG1/Y1V MKUJnKG33hEkjOKUXOhBFLQsZJ4a2cdN0CRCFpqRgxIinFGPHTVPgaCg9bHQIRs1Ijel rV0GfTlF7nEgyGdX8PzGJcJvkliIwCB+/IE6GbfD78XFpXKMgTtTE8Q48tRXwz1XVw1T qCpg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkW5lk+zTdfEmfA0ifspAigc61lKIEp/37wlVfgzk1Rqc8VVP6juJobi0V9ZaucuJuHZvAfl0Y73kAaZsSs5zGpgg4DFVKhfzFIhWItN5Wi7ZtpDCs= MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.66.227.129 with SMTP id sa1mr4910295pac.132.1450442796978; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 04:46:36 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.66.13.233 with HTTP; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 04:46:36 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20151217152435.3c733ac1@xeon-e3> References: <1450098032-21198-1-git-send-email-sshukla@mvista.com> <1450098032-21198-2-git-send-email-sshukla@mvista.com> <20151217152435.3c733ac1@xeon-e3> Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 18:16:36 +0530 Message-ID: From: Santosh Shukla To: Stephen Hemminger Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [ [PATCH v2] 01/13] virtio: Introduce config RTE_VIRTIO_INC_VECTOR X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 12:46:38 -0000 On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 4:54 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > On Thu, 17 Dec 2015 17:32:38 +0530 > Santosh Shukla wrote: > >> On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 6:30 PM, Santosh Shukla wrote: >> > virtio_recv_pkts_vec and other virtio vector friend apis are written for sse/avx >> > instructions. For arm64 in particular, virtio vector implementation does not >> > exist(todo). >> > >> > So virtio pmd driver wont build for targets like i686, arm64. By making >> > RTE_VIRTIO_INC_VECTOR=n, Driver can build for non-sse/avx targets and will work >> > in non-vectored virtio mode. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Santosh Shukla >> > --- >> >> Ping? >> >> any review / comment on this patch much appreciated. Thanks > > The patches I posted (and were ignored by Intel) to support indirect > and any layout should have much bigger performance gain than all this > low level SSE bit twiddling. > I little confused - do we care for this patch?