From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pa0-f46.google.com (mail-pa0-f46.google.com [209.85.220.46]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 634015A71 for ; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 12:43:39 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-pa0-f46.google.com with SMTP id wq6so22522194pac.1 for ; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 03:43:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mvista-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=FcTXVKo7jbBU2JpNUms2F/kh/yMGFPwFK76tXIktXMw=; b=Wl/EPmmxaoVgWllKpnUmWjzBM3Kp/cD0iz9bdFHoiFPAqpGLbPsnJsDsX0kRnIWZm/ JG4gXEF7HhpYzt4Guo7u/te/3OA6/zF0+nr2moiYeNnvUiC5DgzTMJxbDmf1dydBRYx9 HmbV1R8xFNecfUVOapqU5JQ3ENRugWfs1HgMyoP7zz40lgYTnDQyzplbmsFXrelLZwg+ 3uw8GX949lN1dJysMdD5JJW0G8Rh1LO10SG0bVnNn16QIo/G3iwc6UV950iczQAb796Z ZLc26l4MhyqJB/n6EWXXQFKbS46XDOA5Ur7qmW4EyVDuURLvl8bErFGc3XsxJ2frXkjg AK2g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=FcTXVKo7jbBU2JpNUms2F/kh/yMGFPwFK76tXIktXMw=; b=W0X9zm4tLUNrpd5zLynQ3dx+83FzrcAo016Bnp1ZakCT/PHnRWGSJr6iSWA44VcEfB mC0b7tPeuiMEy+sqr8XaF8ItADpPVZSRFynhWJkA8SbnQAZTZvyzF4iKPf+oIK92QYom DIcY/3+9A2+p1tzWUvvoFDsIjlu96iP5+FwLt2jX7aYWZUU5wMM07HzC4hrDRdyWNAL0 2ZV5qkCSq7g3B3fhP50UW0Ab0weAJ7WtAG+EOQL8PupfBjGRwmQWdXcF1/raMD5P94qz NILXofBjUNgv+duYcMbdnDxmRrsbvDdWZB1vtp8GnJUk/i25hA8R+f2lEuW/QFdUtoJ9 JW7A== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkYfToT3RzqN8WxuQ3w0iSDFOEcSqgJaASPwzEB698Cn/IOVG5Xz063Ac+VV2u/h/3CBNuYLuOLUnn3CClhDtLYXurQltNSW5PmVbGCtbb++A24vrY= MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.66.140.79 with SMTP id re15mr60720443pab.127.1450266218615; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 03:43:38 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.66.13.233 with HTTP; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 03:43:38 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <1450098032-21198-1-git-send-email-sshukla@mvista.com> Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 17:13:38 +0530 Message-ID: From: Santosh Shukla To: David Marchand Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [ [PATCH v2] 00/13] Add virtio support in arm/arm64 X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 11:43:39 -0000 On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 2:17 PM, David Marchand wrote: > Hello Santosh, > > On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 8:48 AM, Santosh Shukla wrote: >> >> Hi Yuanhan, Huawei and Others. >> >> I got arch specific review comment from arm maintainers and I am waiting >> for your review feedback on virtio specific patches? Is v3 patch and >> virtio >> iopci bar mapping to user-space approach ok with all? Thanks. > > > Please, don't forget to CC me as well. > > I did something similar for powerpc, but there was no need to add any > remapping in igb_uio. Is it for mapping iopci bar? does that includes virtio For detailed explanation refer [1] [1] http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/9365/ > Is there something specific to arm that makes it impossible to reuse > resources mmapping from /sys ? /sysfs wont map resource0, it could map resource1 i.e. iomem but virtio header resides in iopci bar region so iomem memory wont be effective / invalid addr. For that someone to explicitly map iopci region thus this code/pach. > I can send a patch that should do the job for eal. > Pl. send then, My patches are waiting for review for quite a long time. It will be good if you send now. > I am a bit short on time and will be on holidays for two weeks, so I can't > look at these patches before January. > > > Regards, > -- > David Marchand