From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pf0-f170.google.com (mail-pf0-f170.google.com [209.85.192.170]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22EC38D88 for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 07:16:51 +0100 (CET) Received: by pfu207 with SMTP id 207so42695290pfu.2 for ; Wed, 09 Dec 2015 22:16:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mvista-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=GxNvjb5pPfvRYtBnK2evzqhTw1OsDX1GA0G4KMdXr0E=; b=iqkGL7aV7vG8EQ822TPjb9HbYKWLNUaKpF6gXa0a4d/HKaHIEgAJF8X/UHdQ630l8x J6FPib+pbBPTClsJZ7DYRZEhtj57qxqkCeYdG5fmoAieg/Uzv1KC59M81X3xjyTyrTis 8Jvrzgfd4Fh2lTBRKx/K3CbKy5fM1JlZNt/y60O53fKCvui5gbGz1b+UFa3UYHgr0uSn xYuRHKd+PePRvEWwiutFxfVC93gCinCQ+lLfvRmJs7MAlyC/7+yoYcOp9s7GgbfTqUdy 93OAzCr/8YNHMgtV1F3XprfFyFjOaO001NfzyDKGoNCDXYFODbkblZCtq6AzCfKFqnXu gRvQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=GxNvjb5pPfvRYtBnK2evzqhTw1OsDX1GA0G4KMdXr0E=; b=mU+d1iaUFcGEiDZOt8oQt02+Rhh7up2VWSBho0ULUAM1aAsD2hwXW1lssa5IBEBQD7 xcmYZ/KMpJGYTTYpSddRLMjJwWWTBfWd+48ydTNhzBKkXm3GypHvPLH0IgAmKH7tFPyY 8inA+A58CGgDgCtJfDgeJG0/ftfbfvQ4PJMEv+plR2lZXFX2/T4WAdZOLYZa+NR0uhri WjR2S4mPpz9eDv810X1QIlUB4vvAZRfVGD9F9VtGsilCcZx1bkLNTKgdyOwlgRvKTynY l4vX7gLfRcfOlH/uJTuTiQO0ERNVZFXtZThGIKSJvMTA3MV/V69iXkvOcClItf37M05K OkgA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkqb2HIyedmd70n4CjFHCgs7f9wO+YszpE+V3uWKh7c6LpiS8AXtD/H6Yn/Cr0E0/RBkFzxeiyZp5hNPKroVdecsKVPTgZ/o58IQX+N5ylqUqGZfgA= MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.98.71.138 with SMTP id p10mr4236136pfi.61.1449728210372; Wed, 09 Dec 2015 22:16:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.66.13.233 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Dec 2015 22:16:50 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <1449250519-28372-1-git-send-email-sshukla@mvista.com> <20151207021219.GE29571@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com> Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 11:46:50 +0530 Message-ID: From: Santosh Shukla To: "Xie, Huawei" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/6] Add virtio support in arm/arm64 X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 06:16:51 -0000 On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 6:29 PM, Xie, Huawei wrote: > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Yuanhan Liu [mailto:yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com] >> Sent: Monday, December 07, 2015 10:12 AM >> To: Santosh Shukla >> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; thomas.monjalon@6wind.com; Xie, Huawei >> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Add virtio support in arm/arm64 >> >> On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 11:05:13PM +0530, Santosh Shukla wrote: >> > This patch set add basic infrastrucure to run virtio-net-pci pmd driver >> for >> > arm64/arm. Tested on ThunderX platfrom. Verified for existing dpdk(s) >> test >> > applications like: >> > - ovs-dpdk-vhost-user: across the VM's, for the use-cases like >> guest2guest and >> > Host2Guest >> > - testpmd application: Tested for max virtio-net-pci interface currently >> > supported in kernel i.e. 31 interface. >> >> >> Hi Santosh, >> >> Here is a quick notice that I don't have time to review your patches >> this one or two weeks. Sorry for that. >> >> (Not quite sure Huawei has the bandwidth or not, btw) > Sorry, just back from vocation. We will review your patch. Ping, I have started working on V2 patch set based on review comment so far received. It would be great if I get your review comment too. Also few of my patch code base changes for V2 version gonna overlap with Yuanhan latest virtio 1.0 patch set titled "[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/6 for 2.3] initial virtio 1.0 enabling ", Specially patch 4 and 5. So I would appreciate any review feedback. That avoid overlapping for me. Some questions though: - Shall I rebase Yuanhan's virtio 1.0 patch set, then start v2? By doing that I could leverage "viritio: switch to 64 bit features". In this patch series, I did took care of 32 bit vs 64 bit changes for arm64 case. >> >> --yliu