From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pf0-f175.google.com (mail-pf0-f175.google.com [209.85.192.175]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C682C5A69 for ; Thu, 31 Dec 2015 15:30:44 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-pf0-f175.google.com with SMTP id q63so120885778pfb.0 for ; Thu, 31 Dec 2015 06:30:44 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mvista-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=5jjqbXrTuQsKN5JRR/HD4EY4V/ZHplUI2RL+nqKwx8w=; b=Z+R2CYK+wLoVCZKAKVi9QcZ4hhr3kIN/4njcp/rg/zJ2EOB6awBt7+n90ldEp+gm8U thCMoNxUmueqsZbNjJrhR8S+kszWX7drsIcn5FI34506FGTXSXqC+w0HR5riFxXALcvx +wvG6VL/UXHu7rZfw17PhO52pGd8UmCwvx7kXoFqdCysTCpvJGgdhXTWBk+RBQqo7p9G vMPUOHi46v+ry2GUpw7orIwPUuu/9O+LsbckAVmsWDfD5mottrUqxcR4N04Kbo7hyGpp Vsyj0RVkbX69/29m7SebmNbM3TePq0ilK3pfUWmTSHPJfIxQpkolzXH708ylMb+jmqTz l4sg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=5jjqbXrTuQsKN5JRR/HD4EY4V/ZHplUI2RL+nqKwx8w=; b=juVf7MLkGIsGs0VgZ2adV2ATcEHMiF35YkS8gM4xUDR04fDTpIY5OXR+8TkJ7GZqEG rusURGLb8uuATrHw7KaEocXz++12RzIvnZi7Ri9sPvqLl2+YT3MbQyN7r65OaFOuPC3q VIFWTwGWiL2R4ca5NbaOkh0RCMmMC65WHnm3uFN/jOyUZrQul25u95KSN1YzJW715nhZ 4UHFKzkKBdkEAOgaikZblMX+qOkR2qpRVZwjR37mCSO6CQOJYlUj/3LvThS24pPsMjfa vGJnIQWshH1tIxd7EainFSpsG2VQ/mHqhsL01E7J3s3JyOBFjJWWsWOMkOzAsQDWwraV Eebg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnszs49defZY+aUUxZOzAqoUm6ntOecapNfZhwLECuc3onAe6CkxpJ3jicQTrioM93QgHHuGCghV8Mxad2ud7hQh6/hdHfFKKNdEIZmNArJeOqTyH4= MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.98.19.82 with SMTP id b79mr58969736pfj.28.1451572244180; Thu, 31 Dec 2015 06:30:44 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.66.196.81 with HTTP; Thu, 31 Dec 2015 06:30:44 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <1450198398.6042.32.camel@redhat.com> <20151216040408.GA18363@sivlogin002.ir.intel.com> <1450240711.2674.11.camel@redhat.com> <1450285912.2674.22.camel@redhat.com> <1450370639.2674.93.camel@redhat.com> <20151218104310.GA11371@sivlogin002.ir.intel.com> <1450449520.2674.162.camel@redhat.com> <1450475417.2674.167.camel@redhat.com> <20151221114643.GA30129@sivlogin002.ir.intel.com> <1450725743.3781.56.camel@redhat.com> <1450815609.2950.8.camel@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2015 20:00:44 +0530 Message-ID: From: Santosh Shukla To: "Burakov, Anatoly" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" , Alex Williamson Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] VFIO no-iommu X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2015 14:30:45 -0000 On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 4:49 PM, Burakov, Anatoly wrote: > Hi Alex, > >> I've re-posted the unified patch upstream and it should start showing up in >> the next linux-next build. I expect the dpdk code won't be merged until >> after this gets back into a proper kernel, but could we get the dpdk >> modifications posted as rfc for others looking to try it? > > I have already posted a patch that should work with No-IOMMU. > > http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/9619/ > > Apologies for not CC-ing you. I too would be interested to know if other people are having any issues with the patch. > I tried this patch for virtio-net pmd driver on arm64 and It worked for me. I didn't reviewed patch, but functionally nothing broke in my test environment, we'll review as time permit.. for now Tested-by: Santosh Shukla > Thanks, > Anatoly