From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-it0-f44.google.com (mail-it0-f44.google.com [209.85.214.44]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FEB75911 for ; Tue, 7 Feb 2017 11:21:29 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-it0-f44.google.com with SMTP id c7so76009852itd.1 for ; Tue, 07 Feb 2017 02:21:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=8EqUbX6WEHA8pAP2gVfcRY4IqSYPZ5YbjBqPoHxYcRg=; b=DT3sbfdQEGh3iijTbXyhUif384VzQyIwIhEUt2MW0NHW35UprZQ1h4sTCnn/4sEN+u wIblxMVyEPGvP6zvnvVC2Z1vyXamq1aWb4V3fxqd1VjuTrb4fle4807QkSGvMO+V15o/ 3/D/etO9QuoIov7LC+cfuVjjupmYf9qEiyqMx1rVlsej65LlQFc2POUh3cTiweGisQEJ iWyAlyvdubl8L8sCiVbnScvEJWJi8bcdDVwC+Yxnl0in6KnlXNcPGq8xhOVGB9j4p+ol yVqUb1dzkFi5srtUPfIRe+OUAQ6vLg763ofby4PwV2YisCcEUiGLnlQnsiRVLGTqeEpZ fMXg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=8EqUbX6WEHA8pAP2gVfcRY4IqSYPZ5YbjBqPoHxYcRg=; b=bn2oLhrJRjT9y8fVmbaFQaUEbWDdJQgq26d6p51Eh+73YIpITDZF2yzelRcxxhOzUg ccvh1qy3wvgYwg4oEGxwwPPfGmrlmxsMX2aldnzd/sc/5TS4KyGx6kQey4DuLO7P+MVX xCamu/1Aj4DQggMif389V3VXE9bKCdFM7zz3KP+ye5sssA75HSF03RGnfrPWUdGZ3suD /nwYBM8cqGyZ/+OviZ6CEnQw8XOPh6A4hdLfWUA/RQKNORnODsqJobcLrV+AfPnesgVI x9FhkHG6+4RkyS8EpkvmQ+pnv8ZMmDmyTy8AFelhsc1+4UhrO1pOcFAotrq21bHbte5Z lbaA== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXIlFONp8EhqlAjcCgVoMYP68swMdLNqMiwe46RMu04hq40XOY5kRlnE3PsMZ1X3lynNwwf1qwuYQZHqcw== X-Received: by 10.36.61.136 with SMTP id n130mr11479438itn.107.1486462888711; Tue, 07 Feb 2017 02:21:28 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.64.135.161 with HTTP; Tue, 7 Feb 2017 02:20:58 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <039ED4275CED7440929022BC67E70611530587C2@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com> References: <039ED4275CED7440929022BC67E70611530587C2@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com> From: Ivan Nardi Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2017 11:20:58 +0100 Message-ID: To: "Zhang, Qi Z" Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] 17.02-rc2: i40e and LSC X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2017 10:21:30 -0000 Hi Qi thanks for pointing me to that patch! Regards Ivan On 7 February 2017 at 02:13, Zhang, Qi Z wrote: > Hi Ivan: > This is a bug and is fixed with below patch > http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/20163/ > Regards > Qi > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Ivan Nardi >> Sent: Monday, February 6, 2017 9:13 PM >> To: dev@dpdk.org >> Subject: [dpdk-dev] 17.02-rc2: i40e and LSC >> >> Hi guys >> we are upgrading our application from dpdk 16.11 to 17.02-rc2 and we are >> facing a strange behavior with i40e driver and LSC If we call >> rte_eth_dev_configure() with port_conf.intr_conf.lsc = 1, the call always >> failed with error >> >> Configuring Port 0 (socket 1) >> rte_eth_dev_configure: driver net_i40e does not support lsc Fail to configure >> port 0 >> >> Everything is fine with 16.11 or with port_conf.intr_conf.lsc = 0 (default >> value) >> >> Is this the intended (new) behavior or am I missing something obvious here? >> Thanks in advance >> >> Ivan > > Regards > Qi