DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ivan Nardi <nardi.ivan@gmail.com>
To: "Zhang, Helin" <helin.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>, "Wu, Jingjing" <jingjing.wu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] i40e and memory allocations restricted on node 1
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2017 11:19:50 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAB6Tvp1jAdpUBDtxaOaPGRrvcaTzMc5PqD7zwRPOBOTVNbrqgw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <F35DEAC7BCE34641BA9FAC6BCA4A12E71A9B86C9@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com>

Hi Helin
no luck with the latest nvm

PMD: eth_i40e_dev_init(): FW 5.0 API 1.5 NVM 05.00.05 eetrack 800028ac
RING: Cannot reserve memory
HASH: memory allocation failed
PMD: i40e_init_ethtype_filter_list(): Failed to create ethertype hash table!
EAL: Error - exiting with code: 1

It seems to me the issue is that i40e code try to allocate hash tables
(for tunnel filter list, fdir filter list and ethtype filter list)
from node 0, because it doesn't explicitly set the field socket_id in
struct rte_hash_parameters.
If my analysis is correct, I am wondering if it should allocate memory
from SOCKET_ID_ANY of from the exact node associated with the network
device

Thanks for looking into that

Ivan



On 7 February 2017 at 02:49, Zhang, Helin <helin.zhang@intel.com> wrote:
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Ivan Nardi [mailto:nardi.ivan@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, February 7, 2017 5:04 AM
>> To: dev@dpdk.org
>> Cc: Zhang, Helin; Wu, Jingjing
>> Subject: i40e and memory allocations restricted on node 1
>>
>> Hi
>> With dpdk 17.02-rc2 i40e driver doesn't load at all when memory allocation is
>> restricted on numa node 1 (on system with more than 1 node, obviously)
>>
>>
>> [root@micro ~]# /tmp/testpmd -d /home/micro/lib/librte_pmd_i40e.so -c
>> 0xFFFC000 -w 0000:81:00.0  -w 0000:81:00.1 -n 4 --socket-mem=0,8192 -- -i --
>> socket-num=1
>> EAL: Detected 56 lcore(s)
>> EAL: Probing VFIO support...
>> EAL: PCI device 0000:81:00.0 on NUMA socket 1
>> EAL:   probe driver: 8086:1572 net_i40e
>> PMD: eth_i40e_dev_init(): FW 4.40 API 1.4 NVM 04.05.03 eetrack 80001cd8
> This is a very old verion of firmware, it may have compatibility issue.
> So first, firmware upgrade is needed.
>
>> RING: Cannot reserve memory
> It seems not reserve memory for ring, and not an issue specifically to i40e.
> Let's double check that if it is common to all.
>
>> HASH: memory allocation failed
>> PMD: i40e_init_ethtype_filter_list(): Failed to create ethertype hash table!
>> EAL: Error - exiting with code: 1
>>   Cause: Requested device 0000:81:00.0 cannot be used
>>
>>
>> Everything is fine with 16.11, or allowing allocations from both nodes
>>
>> I was able to locate the code to fix (at least, I hope so), but I don't really
>> know if it is better to allocate from SOCKET_ID_ANY of from the exact node
>> associated with the network device, something like
>> dev->data->numa_node ("pseudo" patch below)
>>
>>
>> --- dpdk-17.02-rc2.orig/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c    2017-01-30
>> 23:47:11.000000000 +0100
>> +++ dpdk-17.02-rc2/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c    2017-02-06
>> 21:53:37.812313120 +0100
>> @@ -899,6 +899,7 @@
>>          .entries = I40E_MAX_ETHERTYPE_FILTER_NUM,
>>          .key_len = sizeof(struct i40e_ethertype_filter_input),
>>          .hash_func = rte_hash_crc,
>> +        .socket_id = SOCKET_ID_ANY,
>>      };
>>
>>      /* Initialize ethertype filter rule list and hash */ @@ -942,6 +943,7 @@
>>          .entries = I40E_MAX_TUNNEL_FILTER_NUM,
>>          .key_len = sizeof(struct i40e_tunnel_filter_input),
>>          .hash_func = rte_hash_crc,
>> +        .socket_id = SOCKET_ID_ANY,
>>      };
>>
>>      /* Initialize tunnel filter rule list and hash */ @@ -985,6 +987,7 @@
>>          .entries = I40E_MAX_FDIR_FILTER_NUM,
>>          .key_len = sizeof(struct rte_eth_fdir_input),
>>          .hash_func = rte_hash_crc,
>> +        .socket_id = SOCKET_ID_ANY,
>>      };
>>
>>      /* Initialize flow director filter rule list and hash */
>>
>>
>>
>> Any thoughts?
>> Thanks in advance
>> Ivan

      reply	other threads:[~2017-02-07 10:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-02-06 21:04 Ivan Nardi
2017-02-07  1:49 ` Zhang, Helin
2017-02-07 10:19   ` Ivan Nardi [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAB6Tvp1jAdpUBDtxaOaPGRrvcaTzMc5PqD7zwRPOBOTVNbrqgw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=nardi.ivan@gmail.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=helin.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=jingjing.wu@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).