DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dean Marx <dmarx@iol.unh.edu>
To: probb@iol.unh.edu, luca.vizzarro@arm.com,
	yoan.picchi@foss.arm.com,  Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com,
	paul.szczepanek@arm.com
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] dts: add virtual functions to framework
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2025 12:48:07 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CABD7UXOS7oFwJnYEq1t-Bsx6Ews3zqmEqgRU4A=4fSPfbnocNQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250702162331.352313-1-dmarx@iol.unh.edu>

During the process of writing these changes and testing virtual
functions on multiple environments, I came across some notable
behaviors. On Mellanox devices, the current test suites in DTS run
without issue, receiving and forwarding packets as expected. However,
this is not the case on Broadcom and Intel devices, both of which do
not receive or forward packets as expected while running on our
current test suites. While looking into this, I found that Intel VFs
do not receive packets unless they have a destination MAC address that
either matches the VF address, or is broadcast. Additionally, the
testpmd forwarding mode must be set to MAC rather than IO. As for
Broadcom, packet reception and forwarding behaves as expected while
running a testpmd session manually, but requires a broadcast address
when sending a packet through DTS (though I'm not quite sure why yet.)
In summary, virtual function runs only pass DTS suites on Mellanox
devices.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-07-02 16:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-17 20:13 [PATCH v1] " Dean Marx
2025-06-26 15:27 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] " Dean Marx
2025-06-26 15:27   ` [PATCH v2 2/4] dts: remove unnecessary testpmd verification Dean Marx
2025-06-26 15:27   ` [PATCH v2 3/4] dts: modify existing suites to work with VFs Dean Marx
2025-07-02 16:23     ` [PATCH v3 1/4] dts: add virtual functions to framework Dean Marx
2025-07-02 16:23       ` [PATCH v3 2/4] dts: remove unnecessary testpmd verification Dean Marx
2025-07-02 16:23       ` [PATCH v3 3/4] dts: add physical function capability check Dean Marx
2025-07-02 16:23       ` [PATCH v3 4/4] dts: add sr-iov section to docs Dean Marx
2025-07-02 16:48       ` Dean Marx [this message]
2025-06-26 15:27   ` [PATCH v2 4/4] dts: add physical function capability check Dean Marx

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CABD7UXOS7oFwJnYEq1t-Bsx6Ews3zqmEqgRU4A=4fSPfbnocNQ@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=dmarx@iol.unh.edu \
    --cc=Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=luca.vizzarro@arm.com \
    --cc=paul.szczepanek@arm.com \
    --cc=probb@iol.unh.edu \
    --cc=yoan.picchi@foss.arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).