From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2470A46192; Tue, 4 Feb 2025 22:08:25 +0100 (CET) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7B0640265; Tue, 4 Feb 2025 22:08:24 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-yb1-f176.google.com (mail-yb1-f176.google.com [209.85.219.176]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7780940261 for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2025 22:08:23 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-yb1-f176.google.com with SMTP id 3f1490d57ef6-e589c258663so5784298276.1 for ; Tue, 04 Feb 2025 13:08:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iol.unh.edu; s=unh-iol; t=1738703303; x=1739308103; darn=dpdk.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=rZ+mJk+aTE1iSYFfEzfIMtpBnkIL9ClFAzz9eOzYHHw=; b=IU9OGRidMWVTJSLFCDioayjvV9SHp2JfrHoncGDZCFIN6RwRcRu6EX0gJlb7DtmB42 zcQHeAp5o4MFDWYZsM1cdRC6R772KKmjlfvyDNw3MWHaG4nVgb7bZFv+Iw/zGCd5HJvs hMl757c7LXpykQukWVZxgsfKMpxj68NGrYt9s= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1738703303; x=1739308103; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=rZ+mJk+aTE1iSYFfEzfIMtpBnkIL9ClFAzz9eOzYHHw=; b=WxEpi7bqgHUtMVJP/pdf6c6aumaMF20C6k/G+c4pXwMlQLjvZKlwj9ylNS6jIlLpft kbnMgxQiIBknEswjM4rtu6J08jVDGv1mz5yneayp4Hn7F0VdN7MtHX0hefDdE/cWn0aL NURqj3SMhFXHNf4jSmTSIHEQVd411McMFuLJxCCGG6aR54Uu6y6tAXgnh7Tu3Hr7+VzL 3TMcek/TCCRHej9p+FfnsK0dh50DDDQDAaPCSdJ+jTvHO8hW8+9xqxkAI5lKE72aVHoX dmxByEJXF+v51tsPvaCAEBMO2q8FcxFXcrEntIo148yukMOLL32bUaG0D3LR38iUxoMI FEqg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzxHZ9H0BMq5gGMQM7+o5hN+8w30Zf6P6P8VjQm35GdTy/fVQje zmrJCBIAE7MlE1GYWNfDvDPTW7ieO3QZjTkANfmd+rSBRKXMKT6jR/ZELHEVzrcPBHYEF4T2e/z j16P/z2fKEruFG9SOPw4bk03NAiQ7C6REnt20Dw== X-Gm-Gg: ASbGnct44haIE456em1iwdc2ePCRhv1cs53XYRPuSKHv+TZGGYIrW9BbkCdKkxEvl48 UdlqrE/xyRz9NJR7nshSAe6aw+TYRM+U79jc3OC2geVXtYCcppvWl9HIVpeVt+6mUO66kTJPIe0 RK48Y9kL8urgen2grpaTu10SvhRsKBsUc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFATAeDumtESTeaQ4ssoZUSlJdlfou5HVFXSZ3zbI1+VQspf9wPYUFvM+pZFkatSS8rQKC1somGj3mcfJCDwDc= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6902:2505:b0:e5b:257e:c3ab with SMTP id 3f1490d57ef6-e5b259d2cbemr482257276.10.1738703302758; Tue, 04 Feb 2025 13:08:22 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20250203151613.2436570-1-luca.vizzarro@arm.com> In-Reply-To: <20250203151613.2436570-1-luca.vizzarro@arm.com> From: Dean Marx Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2025 16:08:11 -0500 X-Gm-Features: AWEUYZmu3j6B2wDTvl-Vlu-8wiNUcdehSUvx-gZ-NsZrolZfSEvMy-b23NfN4Ps Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/7] dts: revamp framework To: Luca Vizzarro Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Patrick Robb , Paul Szczepanek Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Hi Luca, I saw in the meeting minutes that the main purpose of this series is to implement the separation of concern principle better in DTS. Just wondering, what parts of the current framework did you think needed to be separated and why? I'm taking an OOP class this semester and we just started talking in depth about separation of concerns, so if you wouldn't mind I'd be interested in your thought process. Working on a review for the series currently as well, should be done relatively soon. Thanks, Dean