From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B83F246ABD; Wed, 2 Jul 2025 04:09:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5389D40298; Wed, 2 Jul 2025 04:09:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-lf1-f46.google.com (mail-lf1-f46.google.com [209.85.167.46]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60A6640264 for ; Wed, 2 Jul 2025 04:09:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-lf1-f46.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-553b5165cf5so8453152e87.0 for ; Tue, 01 Jul 2025 19:09:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; t=1751422156; x=1752026956; darn=dpdk.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=kR/Iq0YfKH1/89nAk7aLGvPFItwQmd3X2iO5gvcnSi8=; b=jA1MWFSLIPmyYIUvO+jw/LHdtZVWVmw8cbr6ERt54Jp8g9g846bIRQEv+m01Dhz+sI HU+qLwvDQPPYQll64dGgdDfvkEHoaxSzViEOBjWA8rBzKQXgZe+uNfrLOnGj3nSrzh3T g2AJ/qkutpgDV4LlBqmnkRlmN53975705eJzilRz/yHFe1asoqjSKy4Ta8W8UqGvK5rq SCa6OHpSeZOZ0NnhcipDnDjWARE1jCBEkyNVjExtuT+Xlp370u6ERWfNidd7MW+hhz/c wrAah6d+3XZnmv4gAYCyhVBNdn0Mw/Fy6XByyfj/6pGhdBHtz7hQn4FQ6h6tZy4OD9/c CYYQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1751422156; x=1752026956; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=kR/Iq0YfKH1/89nAk7aLGvPFItwQmd3X2iO5gvcnSi8=; b=frW50b7SzwRwOpmOkRdMk/SmcxlJlSDBX2IAYUn664ANKX3sg6YPVkd7R9sTzNNdqg n7k7N96Wdok2Hqz1IyGBrXiSklbkUBaTnZFszSgPUcwhn7/qHfJtzcZ36Epxfseou75t 3WOBsFfmFqlL5ghCGrvPFpjqwPWJXZr4/4Z0oTjK/kPE2SUrjnWTtHPej1etBjr6FBTj um3R39gxvdbTuEVXzr1YeIJr2znrGCzZO62EofHxrS8uWhTwYk3fMNCOLGEErkQKjqqi 7Oou8SfHc5fClzuvEodLWrNMT+3Cr51Jrmcyu7lYfqhTMRD9KT/n8tyeDA5EEJq3OipR gdsA== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVDSYtSwFp5ivsAV5qVdjpjatURv/XfqkC5Rnmh0OFVyrKsAXh7HSdb1UDt/zT9Ybykvhw=@dpdk.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yx2/Ne3F++tYoMWcmwky9uoSUfbjzZ7bHtYXsixTwffxMfhuioV bQLzlNSdt4ISDsz1Mq/BSKsG6gHNC5qlnVfaDjXbUzuNc7utF1Lsp0DgUZVYZ8hdFVrun3Ji2gd 08a2dEwvJI8QgPugmQgeR5gpssXfPCnEJ4AQcOCyszA== X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncuPfegBKnVggA6KvvUsKIVNelIqdKp8jEmCpu6HcuFqJkz1Zlnr7yyeU7BWBxH EOA+NPml1eicqpDaawgc3xECaXexHAnhfLT5K3jA4RuNMacEOmy/p8atN7LQPTp2CSH+rNbeXuL FHGdI18IfWAXz9B4y5y/FnpV7xTAczPe42Is5kHACc0ehpgvsKoKXqhw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFXGGpgbm+H1XPxAXkJfpBxh2UAbsp5Kr9siu8nSNBFsUgYq9KGIYswoP+ozYY8kbLJW79CEgOfJSYbO1n2J0g= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:b97:b0:553:cfa8:dd38 with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-5562831ba82mr356583e87.36.1751422155601; Tue, 01 Jul 2025 19:09:15 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20250620033515.86501-1-zhangfei.gao@linaro.org> In-Reply-To: From: Zhangfei Gao Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2025 10:09:04 +0800 X-Gm-Features: Ac12FXyw7NCmV6n7qp3S-0lQ4unvpbfyCwPFbPOK0InQ2sSSjistMk9Uq1lEqnE Message-ID: Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] [PATCH v3 0/2] uadk: realize async mode To: Akhil Goyal Cc: Fan Zhang , Ashish Gupta , "dev@dpdk.org" , David Marchand , "NBU-Contact-Thomas Monjalon (EXTERNAL)" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org On Mon, 30 Jun 2025 at 18:15, Akhil Goyal wrote: > > > Hi, Akhil > > > > On Mon, 30 Jun 2025 at 17:04, Akhil Goyal wrote: > > > > > > > > > make[2]: Entering directory '/home/gakhil/up/uadk' > > > > > > depbase=3D`echo wd_alg.lo | sed 's|[^/]*$|.deps/&|;s|\.lo$||'`;= \ > > > > > > /bin/bash ./libtool --tag=3DCC --mode=3Dcompile gcc -DHAVE_C= ONFIG_H -I. > > - > > > > Wall -Werror -fno-strict-aliasing -I./include -fPIC -fPIE -pie -fst= ack-protector- > > > > strong -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3D2 -O2 -ftrapv -Wl,-z,relro,-z,now -Wl,-s= - > > > > DUADK_VERSION_NUMBER=3D"\"UADK version: 2.9.0\"" - > > > > DUADK_RELEASED_TIME=3D"\"Released June 6, 2025\"" -g -O2 -MT wd_al= g.lo > > - > > > > MD -MP -MF $depbase.Tpo -c -o wd_alg.lo wd_alg.c &&\ > > > > > > mv -f $depbase.Tpo $depbase.Plo > > > > > > libtool: compile: gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -Wall -Werror -fno-s= trict- > > aliasing > > > > -I./include -fPIC -fstack-protector-strong -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3D2 -O= 2 -ftrapv > > - > > > > Wl,-z,relro,-z,now -Wl,-s "-DUADK_VERSION_NUMBER=3D\"UADK version: > > 2.9.0\"" > > > > "-DUADK_RELEASED_TIME=3D\"Released June 6, 2025\"" -g -O2 -MT wd_al= g.lo > > - > > > > MD -MP -MF .deps/wd_alg.Tpo -c wd_alg.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/wd_al= g.o > > > > > > wd_alg.c: In function =E2=80=98wd_check_ce_support=E2=80=99: > > > > > > wd_alg.c:106:44: error: =E2=80=98HWCAP_CE_SM3=E2=80=99 undeclar= ed (first use in this > > > > function) > > > > > > 106 | if (!strcmp("sm3", alg_name) && (hwcaps & HWCAP_CE_SM3= )) > > > > > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > > > > wd_alg.c:106:44: note: each undeclared identifier is reported o= nly once > > for > > > > each function it appears in > > > > > > wd_alg.c:115:46: error: =E2=80=98HWCAP_CE_SM4=E2=80=99 undeclar= ed (first use in this > > > > function) > > > > > > 115 | if (!strcmp("(sm4)", alg_tail) && (hwcaps & HWCAP_CE_S= M4)) > > > > > > | ^~~~~~~~~~= ~~ > > > > > > wd_alg.c: In function =E2=80=98wd_check_sve_support=E2=80=99: > > > > > > wd_alg.c:128:15: error: =E2=80=98HWCAP_SVE=E2=80=99 undeclared = (first use in this > > function) > > > > > > 128 | if (hwcaps & HWCAP_SVE) > > > > > > | ^~~~~~~~~ > > > > > > make[2]: *** [Makefile:1055: wd_alg.lo] Error 1 > > > > > > > > This is solved by https://github.com/Linaro/uadk/pull/679 > > > > Will be merged next week. > > > > > > So are you going to update this patchset with newer version of uadk? > > > > How bout just adding bug fix patches on master branch. > > or have to ensure the dependent uadk release version build no problem > > on both x86 and Arm? > > How is the DPDK user supposed to build your driver without proper tag of = uadk? > May be apply a hot fix tag(2.9.1 or something) on UADK and mention that i= n your driver doc. > You need to ensure when someone picks a particular DPDK release, > your driver can be built with the version mentioned in your PMD doc. Thanks Akril for the guidance. Have applied a fix tag v2.9.1 to solve the x86 build issue. https://github.com/Linaro/uadk/releases/tag/v2.9.1 Will update the patches. Thanks