From: Banashankar KV <banveerad@gmail.com>
To: "Wiles, Roger Keith" <keith.wiles@windriver.com>
Cc: "<dev@dpdk.org>" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] pktgen offload checksum flag not able to make it work with pacp packets.
Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2014 14:53:44 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CABkBM5FM6YZpyYBLhs81YbG_5CbCxqBiTqDjhVoPCNsJSV4vnQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FE91E82-8097-451E-A36D-2F1254573A89@windriver.com>
Hi,
Thanks a lot for the reply !
Yes I have checked those examples and had set all those flags. But IP
checksum started working after commenting off the txq_flags from
the pktgen.c file's tx_conf .
And I added the following flag to calculate the tcp checksum.
m->ol_flags |= PKT_TX_TCP_CKSUM
its calculating the TCP checksum but turning out to be wrong checksum.
Thanks
Banashankar
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 11:44 AM, Wiles, Roger Keith <
keith.wiles@windriver.com> wrote:
> I have not enabled that feature myself, but I would expect it to work as
> long as the hardware does. What does the docs say about enabling hardware
> offload support? Did you look at the following files:
>
> ip_reassembly/ipv4_rsmbl.h: m->ol_flags |= PKT_TX_IP_CKSUM;
> ipv4_frag/rte_ipv4_frag.h: out_pkt->ol_flags |=
> PKT_TX_IP_CKSUM;
>
> Thanks
> ++Keith
>
> *Keith Wiles*, Principal Technologist for Networking member of the CTO
> office, *Wind River*
> mobile 940.213.5533
> [image: Powering 30 Years of Innovation]<http://www.windriver.com/announces/wr30/>
>
> On Jan 24, 2014, at 12:54 PM, Banashankar KV <banveerad@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I was modifying a packet in pktgen_pcap_mbuf_ctor()
> and after modifying I wanted to offload the checksum calculation to h/w
> so I am setting these flags in pktgen_pcap_mbuf_ctor function.
>
> m->pkt.vlan_macip.f.l2_len = sizeof(struct ether_hdr);
> m->pkt.vlan_macip.f.l3_len = sizeof(struct ipv4_hdr);
>
> m->ol_flags = PKT_TX_IP_CKSUM
>
>
> I even tried with setting .txq_flags = 0 in rte_eth_txconf struct in
> pktgen.c.
>
> But still not able to get the h/w checksum. Am I missing anything ?
>
>
>
> Thanks
> Banashankar
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-25 22:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-24 18:54 Banashankar KV
2014-01-24 19:44 ` Wiles, Roger Keith
2014-01-25 22:53 ` Banashankar KV [this message]
2014-01-26 2:46 ` Wiles, Roger Keith
2014-01-27 0:38 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2014-01-27 8:02 ` Vladimir Medvedkin
2014-01-27 19:25 ` Banashankar KV
2014-01-27 19:04 ` Banashankar KV
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CABkBM5FM6YZpyYBLhs81YbG_5CbCxqBiTqDjhVoPCNsJSV4vnQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=banveerad@gmail.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=keith.wiles@windriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).