From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-oi0-f50.google.com (mail-oi0-f50.google.com [209.85.218.50]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26C595941 for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 10:24:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-oi0-f50.google.com with SMTP id u20so4131869oif.23 for ; Tue, 02 Sep 2014 01:29:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=XLi8uvkWnR8MXSnfRVmHDCRHxqgs3tss/JjVA4e38ug=; b=0iH5+3/mW85re1UvaTB2TXPjy/2rbBLSyAaAIei9yZmbUYKxjmpFhXAbKNuQFjcFK3 RgLjQNct9cbRnfk3o/Blf3FoYmsEcPujyi4IpaX5q8ee5FOvkbSYtOvPTZbO9kuxLzyp Lcs172TSnJiMKPWEQ3OGlEWO0+40BAtm0x5D3buOzSuehvZuetwkE63BRQXtC4QywO/p ZBOugbyUeqnuxfuNa6+SHfpA3IyRwPl8kWtLqvC/EdVwWNWw6s8+RvsXK8BmLX8OFhfq LB7cISrDdt6CMhTiBecnKzToe5nJQxJr6N2LsgVPddYfuG9oP4Fh+9LNTREBTS7lxof5 E2gw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.245.138 with SMTP id xo10mr3354343oec.12.1409646562301; Tue, 02 Sep 2014 01:29:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.202.75.140 with HTTP; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 01:29:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20140829090809.2f3d42a8@urahara> References: <1407880053-14650-1-git-send-email-tomas.vestelind@gmail.com> <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB9772582135F65F@IRSMSX105.ger.corp.intel.com> <20140829090809.2f3d42a8@urahara> Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2014 10:29:22 +0200 Message-ID: From: Tomas Vestelind To: Stephen Hemminger Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] hash: added rte_hash_keys to extract all keys X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 08:24:52 -0000 Hello! If there's already an iterator then I guess this patch is superfluous. I tried searching for it among the e-mails but I can find it, can someone point me to it? If you still think this has some values I will take the given feedback and make corrections. Best regards, Tomas Vestelind ps. Stephen sorry for the extra mail, I forgot to cc the correct people in the first one. On 8/29/14, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > We implemented a more general hash iterator, thought the patch was already > submitted. >