From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qa0-x230.google.com (mail-qa0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c00::230]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B25F06948 for ; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 21:17:36 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-qa0-f48.google.com with SMTP id f11so17010095qae.35 for ; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 12:19:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=l+VrfjmJzODS7/qgGq80k4NTlZNbynqGlf8u3E3ZrXY=; b=d01b7lmCHeBdW/arvkdTI0/BQGMOaO16kt0jrKYSTsShmsmVxHNhu/WK8s0gkGJoRu eF40kAe68gTIEiH+poQphWMeDHJfqwpWCMTXeDuSWJGSUDsdZp9VA/AQJnXlgN2+K7BC QJNW8/ySl7tBKgZOU3v4BisS/kW8C50bHgWAyPxKTq/9nA9Kf6/xYnVhBtgsEaZ0i7Tk CVNaF2hDe6H4o3u4LH9iX7FW7YeKX2SOyEZyZ0qnw8T6PuZySlWTZYsvv0yhsXyeyH2y vq44q2fPQPSKmuYNB+YEy+TtHvulCPqjTLE81tfFLpO50+IjspRcwE5CWuWH6BhQU/Ib gKZA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.140.96.180 with SMTP id k49mr5738245qge.4.1392322740049; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 12:19:00 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.224.123.198 with HTTP; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 12:19:00 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 15:19:00 -0500 Message-ID: From: Ymo Lists To: dev@dpdk.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Is it possible to have dpdk running with no dependency on a nic ? X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 20:17:37 -0000 Is this a faq ??? On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 1:21 PM, Ymo Lists wrote: > 1) I have two apps that need to communicate on the same machine . Is it > possible to have these two apps communicating via dpdk without referencing > a nic ? > > 2) The apps need to run on an amazon vm. How can you run dpdk on an amazon > vm with only one nic if the above is not possible ? >