On Thu, Jul 1, 2021 at 12:44 PM David Marchand wrote: > On Thu, Jul 1, 2021 at 8:13 PM Ajit Khaparde > wrote: > > > > Set rxq interrupt config to 0 instead of 1. > > Applications can set the rxq interrupt config to 1 or 0 as needed. > > If an application is not interested in handling Rx interrupts and > > prefers to poll Rx rings, there is no need for the PMD to set this > > config option to 1. > > > > Signed-off-by: Ajit Khaparde > > Reviewed-by: Lance Richardson > > --- > > drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_ethdev.c | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_ethdev.c > b/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_ethdev.c > > index 495c6cd21e..bef9605fed 100644 > > --- a/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_ethdev.c > > +++ b/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_ethdev.c > > @@ -1011,7 +1011,7 @@ static int bnxt_dev_info_get_op(struct rte_eth_dev > *eth_dev, > > }; > > eth_dev->data->dev_conf.intr_conf.lsc = 1; > > > > - eth_dev->data->dev_conf.intr_conf.rxq = 1; > > + eth_dev->data->dev_conf.intr_conf.rxq = 0; > > The application passes a dev_conf structure at configure time. > This structure configures many features, like rx interrupts. > Resetting anything from this configuration in the get_infos op is > wrong, be it 1 or 0. Agree. I will spin a v2. > > Idem with LSC. > I was testing that as well. But I could not complete all the tests. > > I don't think enabling LSC works as expected, because this driver does > not report the RTE_ETH_DEV_INTR_LSC capability. > Which leads me to a question for ethdev maintainers. > I am surprised we don't have a capability for rx interrupts, is this > feature advertised through another way than device flags? > > > -- > David Marchand > >