On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 11:10 PM Bing Zhao wrote: > > Hi Ajit, > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Ajit Khaparde > > Sent: Saturday, April 17, 2021 5:47 AM > > To: Bing Zhao > > Cc: Ori Kam ; NBU-Contact-Thomas Monjalon > > ; ferruh.yigit@intel.com; > > andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru; dev@dpdk.org > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] ethdev: introduce conntrack flow action > > and item > > > > > > > + > > > > > +/** > > > > > + * @warning > > > > > + * @b EXPERIMENTAL: this structure may change without prior > > > > notice > > > > > + * > > > > > + * Configuration parameters for each direction of a TCP > > > > connection. > > > > > + */ > > > > > +struct rte_flow_tcp_dir_param { > > > > > + uint32_t scale:4; /**< TCP window scaling factor, 0xF to > > > > disable. */ > > > > > + uint32_t close_initiated:1; /**< The FIN was sent by this > > > > direction. */ > > > > > + /**< An ACK packet has been received by this side. */ > > > > > + uint32_t last_ack_seen:1; > > > > > + /**< If set, indicates that there is unacked data of the > > > > connection. */ > > > > > + uint32_t data_unacked:1; > > > > > + /**< Maximal value of sequence + payload length over sent > > > > > + * packets (next ACK from the opposite direction). > > > > > + */ > > > > > + uint32_t sent_end; > > > > > + /**< Maximal value of (ACK + window size) over received > > packet > > > > + > > > > > length > > > > > + * over sent packet (maximal sequence could be sent). > > > > > + */ > > > > > + uint32_t reply_end; > > > > > > > > This comment is for all members that are part of the packet, Do > > you > > > > think it should be in network order? > > > > > > Almost none of the fields are part of the packet. Indeed, most of > > them are calculated from the packets information. So I prefer to > > keep the host order easy for using and > > > keep all the fields of the whole structure the same endianness > > format. > > > What do you think? > > > > Can you mention it in the documentation and comments? > > That all the values are in host byte order and need to be converted > > to > > network byte order if the HW needs it that way > > Sure, I think it would be better to add it in the documentation. > What do you think? Documentation - yes. In the comments of the structure in the header file - if possible. > > BR. Bing