From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 525F5A0A02; Tue, 18 May 2021 19:20:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C89134068E; Tue, 18 May 2021 19:20:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-qk1-f175.google.com (mail-qk1-f175.google.com [209.85.222.175]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B45540041 for ; Tue, 18 May 2021 19:20:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-qk1-f175.google.com with SMTP id x8so10053747qkl.2 for ; Tue, 18 May 2021 10:20:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=broadcom.com; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=llu8U7O93kOn/D8GFLBesgJyici3RYxyy+jxoIK7Yso=; b=fzPqK/4prp/IYqUqdB2grCiESymsDetr+RfIiG2f4vzQjDO2g+blQxpltPdGMfdiU1 5arC6kKdy5l+dd6xW3GFLu4zLjBofNy8mAqaTIzm6PZxr9qMu7p+x+OlNCyyeNLo2Mra 5UFcKWx2iKoAWeuQAQy6x6qJ4tEwaVoiy8zfE= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=llu8U7O93kOn/D8GFLBesgJyici3RYxyy+jxoIK7Yso=; b=Spfz8FDHntxsCMRXoGBdree5IgrYw8mo7nG0IxkpaLzbyB7IdSbaCwJiLY98iGx52a m7pxAVwmGVWPVrP5Q1UwxBniQSWJE4iRaNcZq7AO3IxEVtd6vCWFCYdK8+booYzUJYLt Lcuixc2Zz0m/rsrhR6eBfKE+LIxcRZXJp0To5ofJlBP+52tDblaEVT0mu9SB4+KtcR4m HmTmy9KFMewQh5liziqlp0gqlrp++GT8eE2c8WFffvygVtpv8AjQvuprfgwc8iiLAp7m XOTigAu5EaWY6HTekcch55P9z+LYEWYy97eXBe+yTj9+VNQeErV/3KaQh2hXvf83EzK8 OPDQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532GkyhWCGj8/KN4+2ByIP4rltbf8xVfs8fTmgOFcb2QQdblpUhO D0VwqZhX5dm8jnE0n1+kGmBrnaufP6ekWeDTblBR+g== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx6f7aOeYOWtQQeqO0MTZqBdG9Cnh6cmvX0IXYZlFeTyeM+pIWwaBdWD+j4XLhV0XxLUQqMUhcI/WabxnJ6nYQ= X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:6ce:: with SMTP id 14mr6693402qky.423.1621358424725; Tue, 18 May 2021 10:20:24 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1610304247-11455-1-git-send-email-asafp@nvidia.com> <20210328190005.4185594-1-thomas@monjalon.net> <45ecbd36-089c-a8a6-740f-3660310dee9d@intel.com> <5731405.XtSjWBXQUY@thomas> <5fa24714-796e-c312-08df-d516e4f6e68e@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <5fa24714-796e-c312-08df-d516e4f6e68e@intel.com> From: Ajit Khaparde Date: Tue, 18 May 2021 10:20:08 -0700 Message-ID: To: Ferruh Yigit Cc: Thomas Monjalon , dpdk-dev , David Marchand , Asaf Penso , John McNamara Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha-256; boundary="000000000000fb985905c29dec9b" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6] doc: add release milestones definition X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" --000000000000fb985905c29dec9b Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" > > > >> I already mentioned above, but this can cause misunderstanding. We want > all > >> driver implementation to be ready for proposal deadline, same as other > patches. > >> But because of its reduced scope (they don't affect all project but only > >> specific vendor), we are flexible to get driver features for -rc2 and > -rc3 too. > > > > -rc3 really? It should be exceptional so not mentioned here. > Agree. Let's keep it to -rc2. > > > > In practice we are having it, but agree to have it exceptional and not > mention > in the guide. > > >> Please check number of driver patches merged for a release, it is > impossible to > >> manage them within period between -rc1 & -rc2. > >> Also some driver features are complex and big, they should be sent > before > >> proposal deadline so that they can be reviewed for the release. > > > > Yes sooner is better. The doc is about deadline + priorities, > > showing the no-go limits, without warranty of merge if all good. > > Is there a contradiction? > > > > My concern is document can be read as, it is normal/expected to send driver > patches after -rc1, because this documents as -rc2 task is driver patches. > > I am OK with it if it is clear that deadline is -rc2, but normal/expected > is to > have driver patches also before proposal deadline. > +1 > > > > --000000000000fb985905c29dec9b--