From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 929EAA0C4C; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 22:30:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31EE1410F7; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 22:30:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-il1-f170.google.com (mail-il1-f170.google.com [209.85.166.170]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B98B410F4 for ; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 22:30:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-il1-f170.google.com with SMTP id y17so363415ilb.9 for ; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 13:30:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=broadcom.com; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=HPYGET3JFE6lSLeYXrNucaDPYk3Wbs1U25P7aaE9Diw=; b=WJ73N9SV7SXDUc5lNdeb5Htk35AEYhrlwHLlKPF6E9ijF7Kn5wPJvewGBB9u+56vZI 8I6XtQeU7TLRyrKyBbp4QXWGRegkl1yB5oztT2N39oGVIknRAgx629yylymNnTN3KLEX ct2KEx4d3p1SmGyS5YDDLbTnGQD6gj06ALpSo= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=HPYGET3JFE6lSLeYXrNucaDPYk3Wbs1U25P7aaE9Diw=; b=xs1a2ExpiGZ1sX6So3OxpuJn04lXaab/dwaMD3Qj4ZkuaWpWbXPzhuy5i27Yc5Zx2A 9ed1JnJphTGpc2ur2/urf7I1f1vB0AS0JuGY3cNKJLmZv1brrFJkLbswv61K9FwxE+Fm /N3oYTInZkShDnRneROE7wx4SHD9CDX5ncd8Tm+xv9TAPMldK8Td5/fmoSaWEid/qS4g E1vwqQ33ZILlFtGf3bHIf9L6zrKxX5Vg7ZtJuOAnDJ9aoY2C1i+NK9qXC00KJDtWdtsk eG6S9dhbbWK2lNbhe4AveO2Tj3RNrfziKKslO4QqA5TJ3itnfZ7+aGUHfhGv6nvDLZCi Wj/w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533hwQvWxxccnKEFyS1ZPJ3nZWAo4715DbreGCeP7veatatk7vSa 1zqljbpauB2VE4IUf2g2KV6ukp1ccFu/LZ2G0Z3VDQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxtrXi8cWES/WhwZRunTs9ikRVUQ7W2OI2dL66uJRaKlrskTUSSlILh0FMeDjSnkiptxIJhht4IO6Wctb+aypo= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:1846:: with SMTP id b6mr11304063ilv.63.1634070646504; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 13:30:46 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20211007032353.93579-1-ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com> <0adf092e-8ab0-3d31-33f6-bd41c61ac2fc@intel.com> In-Reply-To: From: Ajit Khaparde Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2021 13:30:30 -0700 Message-ID: To: Ferruh Yigit Cc: dpdk-dev Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha-256; boundary="0000000000007035dd05ce2db8d7" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] patchset for bnxt PMD X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" --0000000000007035dd05ce2db8d7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 12:49 PM Ferruh Yigit wrote: > > On 10/12/2021 8:03 PM, Ajit Khaparde wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 11:16 AM Ajit Khaparde > > wrote: > >> > >> On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 11:14 AM Ferruh Yigit wrote: > >>> > >>> On 10/7/2021 5:54 PM, Ajit Khaparde wrote: > >>>> On Wed, Oct 6, 2021 at 8:23 PM Ajit Khaparde > >>>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Apart from fixing an issue with Rx queue state at startup, > >>>>> this patchset enhances support for RSS action and > >>>>> optimizes the mbuf requirement at startup by creating the > >>>>> aggregation rings only when needed (rx_scatter is enabled). > >>>>> > >>>>> Please apply! > >>>>> > >>>> Patchset applied to dpdk-next-net-brcm. > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> Hi Ajit, > >>> > >>> dpdk-next-net-brcm conflicts with next-net because of some patches > >>> updating bnxt in next-net. > >>> Can you please rebase 'dpdk-next-net-brcm' on top of latest next-net? > >> Sure. I will send an email once it's ready. > > Done. I have rebased the repo to the latest next-net/main > > and merged the patches. Please try now. > > > > Hi Ajit, > > I am getting lots of checkpatch warnings on the patches in your tree, > but I don't see them in the patchwork. Warnings can be because of the > updates during rebase. > > If there is code change during rebase, to not have a diverge between > the patch in the patchwork and what we are merging, can you please send > and updated version of the effected patches first? There is no code change made during the rebase. My checkpatch run did not point out anything. But let me try again. Thanks Ferruh. Thanks Ajit > This lets us see the CI results and later they can be merge in your tree > again. > --0000000000007035dd05ce2db8d7--